RESEARCH PAPER
Cigarette package design: opportunities for disease prevention
,
 
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
 
2
Faculty of Commerce and Business Administration, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
 
 
Submission date: 2002-02-06
 
 
Acceptance date: 2002-03-25
 
 
Publication date: 2003-06-15
 
 
Corresponding author
JR DiFranza   

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue Worcester, MA 01655, USA
 
 
Tobacco Induced Diseases 2003;1(June):97
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Objective:
To learn how cigarette packages are designed and to determine to what extent cigarette packages are designed to target children.

Methods:
A computer search was made of all Internet websites that post tobacco industry documents using the search terms: packaging, package design, package study, box design, logo, trademark and design study. All documents were retrieved electronically and analyzed by the first author for recurrent themes.

Data Synthesis:
Cigarette manufacturers devote a great deal of attention and expense to package design because it is central to their efforts to create brand images. Colors, graphic elements, proportioning, texture, materials and typography are tested and used in various combinations to create the desired product and user images. Designs help to create the perceived product attributes and project a personality image of the user with the intent of fulfilling the psychological needs of the targeted type of smoker. The communication of these images and attributes is conducted through conscious and subliminal processes. Extensive testing is conducted using a variety of qualitative and quantitative research techniques.

Conclusions:
The promotion of tobacco products through appealing imagery cannot be stopped without regulating the package design. The same marketing research techniques used by the tobacco companies can be used to design generic packaging and more effective warning labels targeted at specific consumers.

 
REFERENCES (85)
1.
Donald Brown testimony, RJR-MacDonald Inc & Imperial Tabacco v The Attorney General of Canada. 661-Sept 28, 1989.
 
2.
Carr-Gregg MRC, Gray AJ: "Generic" packaging – a possible solution to the marketing of tobacco to young people. Medical Journal of Australia. 1990, 153: 585-586.
 
3.
Wells W, Burnett J, Moriarty S: Advertising: Principles and Practice. 1989, Toronto: Prentice-Hall, 80.
 
4.
Rothschild ML: Marketing Communications: From Fundamentals to Strategies. 1987, Toronto: D.C. Health.
 
5.
Anonymous: Title: Doral UL name/package exploratory focus groups. Undated. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50019, 9883-9884.
 
6.
Sheridan MM: Memo to: Mr. JR Shostak. Subject: National introduction of the Camel Lights new package. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50023, 7734-7737. January 13, 1981.
 
7.
Anonymous: Marketing Research Proposal (MDD #82-21210) Title: Salem 100's package test. Undated. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50024, 8630-8634.
 
8.
MacDonald RJR: Export Family Strategy Document (RJR-MacDonald Inc & Imperial Tobacco v The Attorney General of Canada).
 
9.
Thompson JW: Report to RJR-MacDonald: Third Family Creative Direction Recommendation. (RJR-MacDonald Inc & Imperial Tobacco v The Attorney General of Canada). 1984.
 
10.
Barton J, Chassin L, Presson CC: Social image factors as motivators of smoking initiation in early and middle adolescence. Child Development. 1982, 53: 1499-1511. 10.2307/1130077.
 
11.
Pollay RW: Targeting youth and concerned smokers: evidence from Canadian tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control. 2000, 9: 136-147. 10.1136/tc.9.2.136.
 
12.
Joy R: "Regulations create design limitations". World Tobacco. 1992, 17.
 
13.
Koten J: "Tobacco marketers" success formula: make cigarettes in smoker's own image". Wall Street Journal. 22-February 29, 1980.
 
14.
Trachtenberg JA: Here's one tough cowboy. Forbes. 109-February 9, 1987.
 
15.
Gray FC: Letter to Mr. Valentine Appel, of Appel, Haley, Fourieros, Inc. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50039, 1946-August 24, 1972.
 
16.
RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company: Contractual agreement between Keith N. Thomas and RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company regarding a name development and package design project to be completed. Undated. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50494, 7878-7891. March 31, 1986.
 
17.
Whitley JW: Letter from Archer Design to Mr. WH Upchurch at RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50525, 9846-9848. February 4, 1981.
 
18.
Anonymous: Hand written title: "New file: Marlboro never say die-history of red roof pack attack.". Undated. Philip Morris Company Document No. 204599, 0331-0341.
 
19.
Anonymous: New box "sensation transfer" package test. (Interviewer script.). Undated. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50019, 4076.
 
20.
Palmer JG: Marketing Research Department RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company. Memo to: Mr. PR Ray, Jr. Re: Salem Super King package change. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50077, 4681-4682. September 4, 1975.
 
21.
Etzel EC: Marketing Research Department, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company. Marketing Research Report. Camel Filter revised package test. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50046, 9401-9410. May 14, 1979.
 
22.
Sugg WA: Correspondence to Mr. Bowman Gray, entitled "Camel package design". RJ Reynolds Document No. 50045, 3700-June 7, 1957.
 
23.
Anonymous: Consumer/sales research proposal. Consumer research title: Doral Filter monadic/paired comparison package test. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50045, 2036-2037. December 4, 1973.
 
24.
Anonymous: BY package objective statement. Undated. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50080, 2720-2722.
 
25.
Lyon DG: Off Madison Avenue. 1966, NY: G.P. Putnam, 65-66.
 
26.
Anonymous: Opportunities in packaging innovation. Visuals for a presentation. Philip Morris Company Document No. 204486. 1992, 2512-2529.
 
27.
Weaver P, McComas OP, Chesley HW, Latham JR, Christensen TS, Jones R: Transcript of Philip Morris closed circuit broadcast over NBC. Philip Morris Company Document No. 201001, 6093-6102. August 1, 1955.
 
28.
Marketing Research Department, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, Consumer Research Report (MRD #70-0134) Winston 85/Salem 85 package research-group discussion. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50107, 9162-9174. April 16, 1969.
 
29.
Marketing Perceptions, Inc: Merit brand and packaging review-a qualitative research summary prepared for: Philip Morris. Philip Morris Company Document No. 204906. 1992, 7574-7599.
 
30.
O'Leary R: account director at FCB/LEBER KATZ PARTNERS: Memo to Mr. Kevin Verner, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co., Subject: Project LF: name and package design development. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50737, 2801-2804. June 12, 1987.
 
31.
Anonymous: Table X. Images and appeals conveyed by each wrapper (for Camel Filters). RJ Reynolds Document No. 50040. 1965, 8261-8265.
 
32.
Anonymous: Unidentified sketches shown to respondents. Undated. Philip Morris Company Document No. 204486, 2633-2651.
 
33.
Leo Burnett IdeaLab Team: Memo to Philip Morris IdeaLab Team. Re: Summary document for Virginia Slims Idealab. Philip Morris Company Document No. 250008, 6773-6849. April 15, 1992.
 
34.
Thomson RN: Memo to: Dr. RB Seligman, From. Subject: Evaluation of hinge lid plastic package. Philip Morris Company Document No. 1000867, 626-633. October 27, 1966.
 
35.
Hansen C: Philip Morris Inter-office Correspondence to: Judy Carboni. Subject: "Beta packaging"-status report. Philip Morris Company Document No. 202038, 7039-7044. January 7, 1993.
 
36.
Harden RJ: To: Mr. RM. Sanders, Winston Ultra Marketing Research Report. Winston HC package test results. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50004, 5485-5490. June 19, 1980.
 
37.
Letter to Pam Baum from John G. Palmer of RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, RJ Reynolds Document No. 50048, 0434-0435. November 18, 1974.
 
38.
Cheskin L: "Philip Morris launches an expansion program". Secrets of Marketing Success. 1967, NY, Trident Press, 238.
 
39.
Gilbert RS: at Ruder & Finn Incorporated. Philip Morris press release. Philip Morris Company Document No. 201002, 5823-5826. April 19, 1966.
 
40.
Consumer Response Corporation: Real package test presentation to: RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50045, 9284-9380. December 22, 1976.
 
41.
Data Development Corporation: Camel Filter Package Study prepared for RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50056, 6644-6650.
 
42.
Reich S: Philip Morris Inter-office Correspondence to: Susan Alter. Subject: Recommended test markets: Merit Ultra Lights package change. Philip Morris Company Document No. 204027, 0696-0697. May 30, 1986.
 
43.
Anonymous: Winston family package exploratory focus groups. Undated. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50077, 5757-5788.
 
44.
William Esty Company, Inc: Camel Filter cigarettes concept test of three package wrappers. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50070. 1966, 9316-9329.
 
45.
Haller TP: Marketing Research Department. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company. Consumer Research Report, Package design consumer jury. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50235, 3539-3555. October 19, 1966.
 
46.
Miller K: of Philip Morris USA. Memo to: Arun Sinha, Steve Vasquez. Subject: Cambridge package graphics quantitative research. Philip Morris Company Document No. 204111, 3564-3606. April 20,1992.
 
47.
Louis Cheskin Associates: Association tests Philip Morris Filter (brown) packages for Philip Morris, Inc. Philip Morris Company Document No. 204106, 7522-7558. September 30, 196.
 
48.
Lawson JL: To: Mr. WK Neher. Marketing Research Report. Salem competitive smoker package test. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50014, 4550-4559. January 28, 1983.
 
49.
Glaser J: Philip Morris Inter-office Correspondence to Mr. RN Saleeby, Jr. Subject: Final report-Parliament 100 mm package design tests. Philip Morris Company Document No. 204106, 7256-7259. July 21, 1967.
 
50.
Anonymous: Title: 'RL' package test #1. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50045, 9259-9261. November 24, 1976.
 
51.
Gray EJ: Philip Morris Inter-office Correspondence to Mr. JE Lincoln. Subject: Final report – Galaxy package test. Philip Morris Company Document No. 20422156, 56-58. September 28, 1964.
 
52.
Mazzitelli DJ: Philip Morris U.S.A. Marketing Research Department. Package test: timer yellow flying M vs. modified yellow wedge. Philip Morris Company Document No. 204073, 3957-3962. September 17, 1975.
 
53.
Marketing Information Systems Intl., Inc: Virginia Slims pack test presentation. Prepared for Philip Morris. Philip Morris Company Document No. 204486. 1992, 2398-2449.
 
54.
Fiskin MB: Philip Morris Inter-office Correspondence from the Marketing Research Department to R Saleeby, Jr. Subject: Evaluation of four package designs for the new CP cigarette. Philip Morris Company Document No. 100029, 0904-0908. February 4, 1971.
 
55.
Udow A: Philip Morris Inter-office Correspondence from the Marketing Research Department to John Kirtland. Subject: Evaluation of two package designs for Parliament Charcoal 85's. Philip Morris Company Document No. 204006, 8692-8697. September 16, 1970.
 
56.
Consumer Response Corporation. NY, NY: Impact package test-Vantage. Presentation prepared for RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50020. 1978, 6236-6273.
 
57.
Anonymous: Consumer Research Proposal. Title: Camel Filter alternate package research. Undated. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50073, 1155-1161.
 
58.
Miller L: Principles of measurement of visual standout in pack design. Report No. RD. 2039, Group Research & Development Centre, British American Tobacco Co Ltd, May 23 1986. Bates No 102699347–102699500., Restricted.
 
59.
Watkins JJ: Letter to DW Tredennick. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50078, 4737-4739. December 16, 1976.
 
60.
Hribar JR: Memo to Yancey Ford, Re: Buy 2 get 1 free package offer. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50036, 7771-7772. July 16, 1976.
 
61.
Kirby BJ: Letter to Mr. DF Edelschick. Re: Doral package research. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50045, 2063-2071. July 25, 1974.
 
62.
Magness RJ: Marketing Research Department. Consumer research report. Product MM sensation transfer package taste test. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50042, 6319-6387. September 24, 1969.
 
63.
Key T: Memo to SC Wooten Jr. Re: WSL package test. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50078. 1976, 6724-6726.
 
64.
Ottaviani J: Marketing Research Department. Salem 85 (cigarette 1693) Paired comparison in-home placement–blind package test. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50057, 6729-6735. April 21, 1969.
 
65.
Wikowitz RS: of H.D. Ostberg Associates RJ Letter to Timothy Key of RJR Tobacco. Reynolds Document No. 50024, 7117-7120. October 6, 1976.
 
66.
Swaine BG: RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company internal memo to SC Wooten. Re: Winston Super King package test. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50058, 4161-4162. February 17, 1976.
 
67.
Harlow GE: Memo to NW Glover and DA Cummins. Winston King and Salem King package tests-topline. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50031, 8710-14. October 2, 1973.
 
68.
Stuart JB: Marketing Research Department. Camel Filter beige vs. tan package sensation transfer test. RJ Reynolds Document No. 5. 0134-0146. September 29, 1967.
 
69.
Daniel MA: Marketing Research Department, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, to David Schwartz Consumer Response Corporation. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50073, 0705-0706. April 24, 1975.
 
70.
Saloun T: Philip Morris USA Interoffice correspondence to Susan Alter. Subject: Merit package change-test market selection. Philip Morris Company Document No. 204439, 4582-4583. November 12, 1986.
 
71.
Kaget I: Philip Morris USA Interoffice correspondence to HT. Lupton. Subject: Package change-Marlboro 100's (red & soft pack) vs. Marlboro Gold in the Spokane and Seattle warehouse areas. Philip Morris Company Document No. 100185, 8480-8487. April 1, 1971.
 
72.
Coleman HB: Memo to entire Philip Morris sales force. Subject: 1982 3rd Sales Period. Philip Morris Company Document No. 100241, 9775-9806.
 
73.
Gray L: Letter to NW Glover, Re: Vantage menthol package change. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50022, 5677-5678. September 4, 1975.
 
74.
Daniel MA: Marketing Research Department, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, Consumer Research Report Product SC-II package test. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50073, 0658-0673. May 16, 1975.
 
75.
Bultman WF: Memo to DH Murphy Re: Summary of detailed topline results for the M2 package study (Salem). RJ Reynolds Document No. 50084, 7103-7105. October 31, 1980.
 
76.
Consumer Response Corporation: Cigarette package test, screening interview. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50048. 1975, 0384-0403.
 
77.
Bryant DL: Marketing Research Department, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, Consumer Research Report. RJ Reynolds Document No. 50107, 9175-9181. December 27, 1968.
 
78.
Toxic Substances Board: Health or Tobacco: An End to Tobacco Advertising and Promotion. 1989, Wellington, New Zealand, Dept. of Health.
 
79.
Beecham L: UK will ban tobacco advertisements by December. British Medical Journal. 1999, 318: 1716.
 
80.
Seffrin JR: A European tobacco advertising ban. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 1998, 48: 254-256.
 
81.
Canadian Cancer Society: Putting health first: The case for plain packaging of tobacco products. A submission to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health. 1994.
 
82.
Beede PC, Lawson RW: Brand image attraction: the promotional impact of cigarette packaging. New Zealand Family Physician. 1991, 175-177.
 
83.
Centre for Behavioral Research in Cancer: Adolescents' reactions to cigarette packs modified to increase extent and impact of health warnings. Health Warnings and Contents Labeling on Tobacco Products. 1992, Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria.
 
84.
Beede P, Lawson R: The effect of plain packages on the perception of cigarette health warnings. Public Health. 1992, 106: 315-322. 10.1016/S0033-3506(05)80425-1.
 
85.
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC: Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: towards an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1983, 51: 390-395. 10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390.
 
 
CITATIONS (27):
1.
 
2.
 
3.
 
4.
 
5.
 
6.
 
7.
 
8.
 
9.
 
10.
 
11.
 
12.
 
13.
 
14.
 
15.
 
16.
 
17.
 
18.
 
19.
 
20.
 
21.
 
22.
 
23.
 
24.
 
25.
 
26.
 
27.
 
eISSN:1617-9625
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top