Prevalence and correlates of different smoking bans in homes and cars among smokers in 6 Countries of the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys
More details
Hide details
Catalan Institute of Oncology, Catalonia, Spain
Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Catalonia, Spain
University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
European Network on Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP), Brussels, Belgium
University of Crete (UoC), Heraklion, Greece
University of Waterloo (UW), Waterloo, Canada
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
Cancer Prevention Unit and WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
Health Promotion Foundation (HPF), Warsaw, Poland
European Observatory of Health Inequalities, The President Stanisław Wojciechowski State University of Applied Sciences, Kalisz, Poland
University of Medicine and Pharmacy ‘Grigore T. Popa’ Iasi, Iasi, Romania
Aer Pur Romania, Bucharest, Romania
Smoking or Health Hungarian Foundation (SHHF), Budapest, Hungary
Maria Skłodowska-Curie Institute- Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (UoA), Athens, Greece
Publish date: 2019-01-31
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 2):A8
*EUREST-PLUS consortium members: European Network on Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP), Belgium: Constantine I. Vardavas, Andrea Glahn, Christina N. Kyriakos, Dominick Nguyen, Katerina Nikitara, Cornel Radu-Loghin, Polina Starchenko University of Crete (UoC), Greece: Aristidis Tsatsakis, Charis Girvalaki, Chryssi Igoumenaki, Sophia Papadakis, Aikaterini Papathanasaki, Manolis Tzatzarakis, Alexander I. Vardavas Kantar Public (TNS), Belgium: Nicolas Bécuwe, Lavinia Deaconu, Sophie Goudet, Christopher Hanley, Oscar Rivière Smoking or Health Hungarian Foundation (SHHF), Hungary: Tibor Demjén, Judit Kiss, Piroska A. Kovacs Catalan Institut of Oncology (ICO); Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Spain: Esteve Fernández, Yolanda Castellano, Marcela Fu, Sarah O. Nogueira, Olena Tigova Kings College London (KCL), United Kingdom: Ann McNeill, Katherine East, Sara C. Hitchman Cancer Prevention Unit and WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany: Ute Mons, Sarah Kahnert National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (UoA), Greece: Yannis Tountas, Panagiotis Behrakis, Filippos T. Filippidis, Christina Gratziou, Paraskevi Katsaounou, Theodosia Peleki, Ioanna Petroulia, Chara Tzavara Aer Pur Romania, Romania: Antigona C. Trofor, Marius Eremia, Lucia Lotrean, Florin Mihaltan European Respiratory Society (ERS), Switzerland; Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany: Gernot Rohde, Tamaki Asano, Claudia Cichon, Amy Far, Céline Genton, Melanie Jessner, Linnea Hedman, Christer Janson, Ann Lindberg, Beth Maguire, Sofia Ravara, Valérie Vaccaro, Brian Ward Maastricht University, the Netherlands: Marc Willemsen, Hein de Vries, Karin Hummel, Gera E. Nagelhout Health Promotion Foundation (HPF), Poland: Witold A. Zatoński, Aleksandra Herbeć, Kinga Janik-Koncewicz, Krzysztof Przewoźniak, Mateusz Zatoński University of Waterloo (UW); Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada: Geoffrey T. Fong, Thomas K. Agar, Pete Driezen, Shannon Gravely, Anne C. K. Quah, Mary E. Thompson
Second-hand smoke exposure has decreased in a number of countries due to widespread smoke-free legislation in public places, but exposure is still present in private settings like homes and cars. Our objective was to describe to what extent smokers implement smoking rules in these settings in six European Union (EU) Member States (MS).

A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of adult smokers from Germany, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Spain (ITC six European countries survey, part of the EUREST-PLUS Project). We analysed data from 6011 smokers regarding smoking rules in their homes and in cars with children (no rules, partial ban, total ban). We described the prevalence of smoking rules by EU MS and several sociodemographic and smoking characteristics using prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) derived from Poisson regression models.

In homes, 26.5% had a total smoking ban (from 13.1% in Spain to 35.5% in Hungary), 44.7% had a partial ban (from 41.3% in Spain to 49.9% in Greece), and 28.8% had no-smoking rules (from 20.2% in Romania to 45.6% in Spain). Prevalence of no-smoking rules in cars with children was 16.2% (from 11.2% in Germany to 20.4% in Spain). The correlates of not restricting smoking in homes and cars included: low education (PR=1.51; 95%CI: 1.20-1.90 and PR=1.55; 95%CI: 1.09-2.20), smoking >30 cigarettes daily (PR=1.53; 95%CI: 1.10-2.14 and PR=2.66; 95%CI: 1.40-5.05) and no attempts to quit ever (PR=1.18; 95%CI: 1.06-1.31 and PR=1.28; 95%CI: 1.06-1.54).

Among smokers in six EU MS, no-smoking rules were more prevalent in homes than in cars with children. Whilst awareness about the health effects of exposure to tobacco smoke on children seemed to be high, more research is needed to better understand the factors that promote private smoke-free environments.

Marcela Fu   
Tobacco Control Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Av. Granvia de L’Hospitalet, 199−203, 08908 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain
1. World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory data. Accessed March, 2018.
2. World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
3. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Guidelines for implementation of Article 8. Published, 2007. Accessed March, 2018.
4. Uang R, Hiilamo H, Glantz SA. Accelerated adoption of smoke-free laws after ratification of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Am J Public Health. 2016;106:166-171. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302872.
5. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Evaluating the effectiveness of smoke-free policies. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention, Tobacco Control. Vol. 13. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2009.
6. Gravely S, Giovino GA, Craig L, et al. Implementation of key demand-reduction measures of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and change in smoking prevalence in 126 countries: an association study. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2:e166-e174. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30045-2.
7. Eriksen MP. The Tobacco Atlas. 5th ed. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2015.
8. Raoof SA, Agaku IT, Vardavas CI. A systematic review of secondhand smoke exposure in a car: attributable changes in atmospheric and biological markers. Chron Respir Dis. 2015;12:120-131. doi:10.1177/1479972315575202.
9. Orton S, Jones LL, Cooper S, Lewis S, Coleman T. Predictors of children’s secondhand smoke exposure at home: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence. PLoS One. 2014;9:e112690. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112690.
10. Monson E, Arsenault N. Effects of enactment of legislative (public) smoking bans on voluntary home smoking restrictions: a review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017;19:141-148. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntw171.
11. Fernández E, Fu M, Pérez-Ríos M, Schiaffino A, Sureda X, López MJ. Changes in Secondhand Smoke Exposure After Smoke-Free Legislation (Spain, 2006-2011). Nicotine Tob Res. 2017;19:1390-1394. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntx040.
12. Fong GT, Cummings KM, Borland R, et al. The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project. Tob Control. 2006;15 Suppl 3:iii3-iii11. doi:10.1136/tc.2005.015438.
13. Official Journal of the European Union. Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC. 2014;OJ L 127, 57:1-38. http:// Accessed March, 2018.
14. Vardavas CI, Bécuwe N, Demjén T, et al. Study Protocol of European Regulatory Science on Tobacco (EURESTPLUS): Policy implementation to reduce lung disease. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 2018;(Suppl 2:A2). doi:10.18332/tid/93305.
15. Fong GT, Thompson ME, Boudreau C, et al. The Conceptual Model and Methods of Wave 1 (2016) of the EUREST-PLUS ITC 6 European Countries Survey. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 2018;16(Suppl 2:Α3). doi:10.18332/tid/99881.
16. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Rickert W, Robinson J. Measuring the heaviness of smoking: using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day. Br J Addict. 1989;84:791-799. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb03059.x.
17. Borland R, Yong HH, Cummings KM, Hyland A, Anderson S, Fong GT. Determinants and consequences of smoke-free homes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006;15 Suppl 3:iii42-iii50. doi:10.1136/tc.2005.012492.
18. Hyland A, Hassan LM, Higbee C, et al. The impact of smokefree legislation in Scotland: results from the Scottish ITC: Scotland/UK longitudinal surveys. Eur J Public Health. 2009;19:198-205. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckn141.
19. King BA, Hyland AJ, Borland R, McNeill A, Cummings KM. Socioeconomic variation in the prevalence, introduction, retention, and removal of smoke-free policies among smokers: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:411-434. doi:10.3390/ijerph8020411.
20. Mons U, Nagelhout GE, Allwright S, et al. Impact of national smoke-free legislation on home smoking bans: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys. Tob Control. 2013;22:e2-e9. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050131.
21. Hitchman SC, Guignard R, Nagelhout GE, et al. Predictors of car smoking rules among smokers in France, Germany and the Netherlands. Eur J Public Health. 2012;22 Suppl 1:17-22. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckr200.
22. Mills AL, Messer K, Gilpin EA, Pierce JP. The effect of smoke-free homes on adult smoking behavior: a review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11:1131-1141. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntp122.
23. Montreuil A, Hanusaik N, Cantinotti M, et al. Social disparities in children’s exposure to secondhand smoke in privately owned vehicles. Tob Control. 2017;26:663-668. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053347.
24. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 2003.
25. Hull CL. Principles of behavior - An introduction to behavior theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.; 1943.
26. Nebot M, Lopez MJ, Ariza C, et al. Impact of the Spanish smoking law on exposure to secondhand smoke in offices and hospitality venues: before-and-after study. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:344-347. doi:10.1289/ehp.11845.
27. Fernández E, Fu M, Pascual JA, et al. Impact of the Spanish smoking law on exposure to secondhand smoke and respiratory health in hospitality workers: a cohort study. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4244. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004244.
28. Arechavala T, Continente X, Perez-Rios M, et al. Second-hand smoke exposure in homes with children: assessment of airborne nicotine in the living room and children’s bedroom. Tob Control. 2018;27:399-406. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053751.
29. Haw SJ, Gruer L. Changes in exposure of adult nonsmokers to secondhand smoke after implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland: national cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2007;335:549. doi:10.1136/bmj.39315.670208.47.
30. Cheng KW, Okechukwu CA, McMillen R, Glantz SA. Association between clean indoor air laws and voluntary smokefree rules in homes and cars. Tob Control. 2015;24:168-174. doi :10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051121.
31. Sureda X, Martínez-Sánchez JM, Fu M, et al. Impact of the Spanish smoke-free legislation on adult, non-smoker exposure to secondhand smoke: cross-sectional surveys before (2004) and after (2012) legislation. PLoS One. 2014;9:e89430. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089430.
32. Ferketich AK, Lugo A, La Vecchia C, et al. Relation between national-level tobacco control policies and individual-level voluntary home smoking bans in Europe. Tob Control. 2016;25:60-65. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051819.
33. Thomson G, Wilson N, Howden-Chapman P. Population level policy options for increasing the prevalence of smokefree homes. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:298-304. doi:10.1136/jech.2005.038091.
34. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2017: monitoring tobacco use and prevention policies. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
35. Hood NE, Wewers ME, Ferketich AK, Klein EG, Pirie P. Predictors of voluntary home-smoking restrictions and associations with an objective measure of in-home smoking among subsidized housing tenants. Am J Health Promot. 2013;28:97-104. doi:10.4278/ajhp.120816-QUAN-399.
36. Ayo-Yusuf OA, Olufajo O, Agaku IT. Exposure to secondhand smoke and voluntary adoption of smoke-free home and car rules among non-smoking South African adults. BMC Public Health. 2014;14. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-580.
37. King BA, Patel R, Babb SD. Prevalence of smokefree home rules--United States, 1992-1993 and 2010-2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63:765-769.
38. Milcarz K, Bak-Romaniszyn L, Kaleta D. Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Smoke-Free Rules in Homes among Socially-Disadvantaged Populations in Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14. doi:10.3390/ijerph14040447.
39. Diez-Izquierdo A, Lidon-Moyano C, Martin-Sanchez JC, et al. Smoke-free homes and attitudes towards banning smoking in vehicles carrying children in Spain (2016). Environ Res. 2017;158:590-597. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.012.
40. Thun M, Peto R, Boreham J, Lopez AD. Stages of the cigarette epidemic on entering its second century. Tob Control. 2012;21:96-101. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050294.