RESEARCH PAPER
Initial puffing behaviors and subjective responses differ between an electronic nicotine delivery system and traditional cigarettes
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, USA
Publish date: 2014-10-10
 
Tobacco Induced Diseases 2014;12(October):17
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
Background:
Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) present an emerging issue for tobacco control and data on product use behaviors are limited.

Methods:
Participants (N = 38 enrolled; N = 16 compliant) completed three lab visits over 5 days and were asked to abstain from regular cigarettes for 72 hours in favor of ENDS (Smoke 51 TRIO – 3 piece, First Generation with 11 mg/ml filters). Lab visits included measurement of exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and salivary cotinine concentration, questionnaire measures of regular cigarette craving after the 72 hour abstinence, and subjective product effects. Participants used a topography device to record puff volume, duration, flow rate, and inter-puff interval.

Results:
Analyses revealed significant differences across products in puff count, average volume, total volume and inter-puff interval, with ENDS broadly showing a more intensive smoking pattern. Cigarette craving scores dropped significantly after smoking regular cigarettes, but not ENDS (p = .001), and subjective measures showed ENDS rated less favorably. CO boost, after ENDS use, decreased significantly (p < .001), and saliva cotinine significantly dropped between visits 1 and 3 (p < 0.001) after ENDS use relative to after cigarette smoking. For compliant and non-compliant participants, there was an average 82.0% [V1 - 16.1 cpd; V3 - 2.9 cpd] and average 73.9% [V1 - 20.3 cpd; V3 - 5.3 cpd] reduction in regular cigarette use per day during the ENDS trial period, respectively.

Conclusions:
The ENDS were smoked more intensively than own brand cigarettes, but delivered significantly less nicotineand were less satisfying. These findings have implications for the viability of certain ENDS as alternatives to cigarettes.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Richard J O’Connor   
Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, 14263 Buffalo, NY, USA
 
REFERENCES (33):
1. Etter JF, Bullen C, Flouris AD, Laugesen M, Eissenberg T: Electronic nicotine delivery systems: a research agenda. Tob Control. 2011, 20: 243-248. 10.1136/tc.2010.042168.
2. Trtchounian A, Williams M, Talbot P: Conventional and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have different smoking characteristics. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010, 12: 905-912. 10.1093/ntr/ntq114.
3. Trtchounian A, Talbot P: Electronic nicotine delivery systems: is there a need for regulation?. Tob Control. 2011, 20: 47-52. 10.1136/tc.2010.037259.
4. Westenberger BJ: Evaluation of e-cigarettes. St. Louis: US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. 2009,http://www.fda.gov/downloads/D....
5. Uchiyama S, Inaba Y, Kunugita N: Determination of acrolein and other carbonyls in cigarette smoke using coupled silica cartridges impregnated with hydroquinone and 2,4-dinitophenylhydrazine. J Chromatogr A. 2010, 1217: 4383-4388. 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.04.056.
6. Goniewicz ML, Knysak J, Gawron M, Kosmider L, Sobczak A, Kurek J, Prokopowicz A, Jablonska-Czapla M, Rosik-Dulewska C, Havel C, Jacob P, Goniewicz ML, Knysak J, Gawron M, Kosmider L, Sobczak A, Kurek J, Prokopowicz A, Jablonska-Czapla M, Rosik-Dulewska C, Havel C, Jacob P, Benowitz N: Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob Control. 2013, Epub ahead of print.
7. Hua M, Yip H, Talbot P: Mining data on usage of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) from YouTube videos. Tob Control. 2013, 22: 103-106. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050226.
8. Goniewicz ML, Kuma T, Gawron M, Knysak J, Kosmider L: Nicotine levels in electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013, 15: 158-166. 10.1093/ntr/nts103.
9. Adkison SE, O’Connor RJ, Bansal-Travers M, Hyland A, Borland R, Yong HH, Cummings KM, McNeill A, Thrasher JF, Hammond D, Fong GT: Electronic nicotine delivery systems: international tobacco control four-country survey. Am J Prev Med. 2013, 44: 207-215. 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.018.
10. Polosa R, Caponnetto P, Morjaria JB, Papale G, Campagna D, Russo C: Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e-Cigarette) on smoking reduction and cessation: a prospective 6-month pilot study. BMC Public Health. 2011, 11: 786-10.1186/1471-2458-11-786.
11. Goniewicz ML, Lingas EO, Hajek P: Patterns of electronic cigarette use and user beliefs about their safety and benefits: An Internet survey. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2012, Epub ahead of print.
12. Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Cibella F, Morjaria JB, Caruso M, Russo C, Polosa R: EffiCiency and Safety of an eLectronic cigarette (ECLAT) as tobacco cigarettes substitute: a prospective 12-month randomized control design study. PLoS ONE. 2013, 8: e66317-10.1371/journal.pone.0066317.
13. Bullen C, McRobbie H, Thornley S, Glover M, Lin R, Laugesen M: Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: randomized cross-over trial. Tob Control. 2010, 19: 98-103. 10.1136/tc.2009.031567.
14. Tiffany ST, Drobes DJ: The development and initial validation of a questionnaire on smoking urges. Br J Addict. 1991, 86: 1467-1476. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01732.x.
15. Westman E, Levin E, Rose J: Smoking while wearing the nicotine patch: Is smoking satisfying or harmful?. Clin Res. 1992, 40: 871A.
16. Hammond D, Fong GT, Cummings KM, Hyland A: Smoking topography, brand switching, and nicotine delivery: results from an in vivo study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005, 14: 1370-1375. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0498.
17. Blank MD, Disharoon S, Eissenberg T: Comparison of methods for measurement of smoking behavior: mouthpiece-based computerized devices versus direct observation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009, 11: 896-903. 10.1093/ntr/ntp083.
18. Vansickel AR, Eissenberg T: Electronic cigarettes: effective nicotine delivery after acute administration. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013, 15: 267-270. 10.1093/ntr/ntr316.
19. Bullen C, Whittaker R, Walker N, Wallace-Bell M: Pre-quitting nicotine replacement therapy: findings from a pilot study. Tob Induc Dis. 2006, 3: 35-40. 10.1186/1617-9625-3-2-35.
20. Vansickel AR, Cobb CO, Weaver MF, Eissenberg TE: A clinical laboratory model for evaluating the acute effects of electronic “cigarettes”: nicotine delivery profile and cardiovascular and subjective effects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010, 19: 2945-2953.
21. Farsalinos KE, Romagna G, Tsiapras D, Kyrzopoulos S, Voudris V: Evaluation of electronic cigarette use (vaping) topography and estimation of liquid consumption: implications for research protocol standards definition and for public health authorities’ regulation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013, 10: 2500-2514. 10.3390/ijerph10062500.
22. Williams M, Talbot P: Variability among electronic cigarettes in the pressure drop, airflow rate, and aerosol production. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011, 13: 1276-1283. 10.1093/ntr/ntr164.
23. Cummings KM, Hyland A, Giovino GA, Hastrup JL, Bauer JE, Bansal MA: Are smokers adequately informed about the health risks of smoking and medicinal nicotine?. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004, 6 (Suppl 3): 333-340.
24. Hamilton WL, Norton G, Ouellette TK, Rhodes WM, Kling R, Connolly GN: Smokers’ responses to advertisements for regular and light cigarettes and potential reduced exposure tobacco products. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004, 6 (3): 353-362.
25. Parascandola M, Hurd AL, Augustson E: Consumer awareness and attitudes related to new potential reduced-exposure tobacco products. Am J Health Behav. 2008, 32: 431-437.
26. Shiffman S, Pillitteri JL, Burton SL, Di Marino ME: Smoker and ex-smoker reactions to cigarettes claiming reduced risk. Tob Control. 2004, 13: 78-84. 10.1136/tc.2003.005272.
27. Shiffman S, Hughes JR, Ferguson SG, Pillitteri JL, Gitchell JG, Burton SL: Smokers’ interest in using nicotine replacement to aid smoking reduction. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007, 9: 1177-1182. 10.1080/14622200701648441.
28. Fairchild A, Colgrove J: Out of the ashes: the life, death, and rebirth of the “safer” cigarette in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2004, 94: 192-204. 10.2105/AJPH.94.2.192.
29. Ferris Wayne G, Connolly GN: Application, function, and effects of menthol in cigarettes: a survey of tobacco industry documents. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004, 6 (Suppl 1): 43-54.
30. Carpenter CM, Wayne GF, Connolly GN: The role of sensory perception in the development and targeting of tobacco products. Addiction. 2007, 102: 136-147. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01649.x.
31. Wayne GF, Connolly GN: How cigarette design can affect youth initiation into smoking: Camel cigarettes 1983–93. Tob Control. 2002, 11 (Suppl 1): I32-I39.
32. Dawkins L, Turner J, Roberts A, Soar K: ‘Vaping’ profiles and preferences: an online survey of electronic cigarette users. Addiction. 2013, 108: 1115-1125. 10.1111/add.12150.
33. Food and Drug Administration: Deeming Tobacco Products to be subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act; Regulations on the Sale and Distribution of Tobacco Products and Required Warning Statements for Tobacco Products. Fed Regist. 2014, 79 (80): 23142-23207.
 
CITATIONS (16):
1. The association between electronic-cigarette use and self-reported oral symptoms including cracked or broken teeth and tongue and/or inside-cheek pain among adolescents: A cross-sectional study
Jun Ho Cho, Yu Ru Kou
PLOS ONE
2. An Electronic Cigarette Vaping Machine for the Characterization of Aerosol Delivery and Composition
Christopher M. Havel, Neal L. Benowitz, Peyton Jacob, Gideon St.Helen
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
3. E-Cigarette Airflow Rate Modulates Toxicant Profiles and Can Lead to Concerning Levels of Solvent Consumption
Tetiana Korzun, Maryana Lazurko, Ian Munhenzva, Kelley C. Barsanti, Yilin Huang, R. Paul Jensen, Jorge O. Escobedo, Wentai Luo, David H. Peyton, Robert M. Strongin
ACS Omega
4. Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review
Allison M. Glasser, Lauren Collins, Jennifer L. Pearson, Haneen Abudayyeh, Raymond S. Niaura, David B. Abrams, Andrea C. Villanti
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
5. Week Long Topography Study of Young Adults Using Electronic Cigarettes in Their Natural Environment
R. J. Robinson, E. C. Hensel, K. A. Roundtree, A. G. Difrancesco, J. M. Nonnemaker, Y. O. Lee, Raymond Niaura
PLOS ONE
6. A Prototypical First-Generation Electronic Cigarette Does Not Reduce Reports of Tobacco Urges or Withdrawal Symptoms among Cigarette Smokers
Arit M. Harvanko, Catherine A. Martin, Richard J. Kryscio, William W. Stoops, Joshua A. Lile, Thomas H. Kelly
Journal of Addiction
7. Simulation of aerosol dynamics and deposition of combustible and electronic cigarette aerosols in the human respiratory tract
Lukas Pichelstorfer, Werner Hofmann, Renate Winkler-Heil, Caner U. Yurteri, John McAughey
Journal of Aerosol Science
8. Examining Daily Electronic Cigarette Puff Topography Among Established and Nonestablished Cigarette Smokers in their Natural Environment
Youn Ok Lee, James M Nonnemaker, Brian Bradfield, Edward C Hensel, Risa J Robinson
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
9. Extreme testing of undiluted e-cigarette aerosol in vitro using an Ames air-agar-interface technique
D. Thorne, M. Hollings, A. Seymour, J. Adamson, A. Dalrymple, M. Ballantyne, M. Gaca
Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
10. Nicotine delivery, tolerability and reduction of smoking urge in smokers following short-term use of one brand of electronic cigarettes
Carl D. D’Ruiz, Donald W. Graff, X. Sherwin Yan
BMC Public Health
11. Electronic Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation: A Systematic Review
Muhannad Malas, Jan van der Tempel, Robert Schwartz, Alexa Minichiello, Clayton Lightfoot, Aliya Noormohamed, Jaklyn Andrews, Laurie Zawertailo, Roberta Ferrence
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
12. Development, validation and application of a device to measure e-cigarette users’ puffing topography
Anthony Cunningham, Sandra Slayford, Carl Vas, Jodie Gee, Sandra Costigan, Krishna Prasad
Scientific Reports
13. A decade of e-cigarettes: Limited research & unresolved safety concerns
Mohammad Abul Kaisar, Shikha Prasad, Tylor Liles, Luca Cucullo
Toxicology
14. Chemical Composition of Aerosol from an E-Cigarette: A Quantitative Comparison with Cigarette Smoke
Jennifer Margham, Kevin McAdam, Mark Forster, Chuan Liu, Christopher Wright, Derek Mariner, Christopher Proctor
Chemical Research in Toxicology
15. Changes in puffing behavior among smokers who switched from tobacco to electronic cigarettes
Yong Hee Lee, Michal Gawron, Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz
Addictive Behaviors
16. The Influence of a Mouthpiece-Based Topography Measurement Device on Electronic Cigarette User’s Plasma Nicotine Concentration, Heart Rate, and Subjective Effects Under Directed and Ad Libitum Use Conditions
Tory R. Spindle, Marzena M. Hiler, Alison B. Breland, Nareg V. Karaoghlanian, Alan L. Shihadeh, Thomas Eissenberg
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
eISSN:1617-9625