RESEARCH PAPER
Impact of anti-smoking advertising on health-risk knowledge and quit attempts across 6 European countries from the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Survey
 
More details
Hide details
1
Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
2
University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
3
King’s College London (KCL), London, United Kingdom
4
UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, King’s College London (KCL), London, United Kingdom
5
European Network on Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP), Brussels, Belgium
6
University of Crete (UoC), Heraklion, Greece
7
Cancer Prevention Unit and WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
8
Health Promotion Foundation (HPF), Warsaw, Poland
9
European Observatory of Health Inequalities, The President Stanisław Wojciechowski State University of Applied Sciences, Kalisz, Poland
10
University of Medicine and Pharmacy ‘Grigore T. Popa’ Iasi, Iasi, Romania
11
Aer Pur Romania, Bucharest, Romania
12
Smoking or Health Hungarian Foundation (SHHF), Budapest, Hungary
13
University of Athens (UoA), Athens, Greece
14
Maria Skłodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center (MSCI), Warsaw, Poland
15
University of Waterloo (UW), Waterloo, Canada
16
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
17
National Addiction Centre, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Esteve Fernández   

Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
Publish date: 2018-12-17
 
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 2):A5
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
*EUREST-PLUS consortium members: European Network on Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP), Belgium: Constantine I. Vardavas, Andrea Glahn, Christina N. Kyriakos, Dominick Nguyen, Cornel Radu-Loghin, Polina Starchenko University of Crete (UoC), Greece: Aristidis Tsatsakis, Charis Girvalaki, Chryssi Igoumenaki, Katerina Nikitara, Sophia Papadakis, Aikaterini Papathanasaki, Manolis Tzatzarakis, Alexander I. Vardavas Kantar Public (TNS), Belgium: Nicolas Bécuwe, Lavinia Deaconu, Sophie Goudet, Christopher Hanley, Oscar Rivière Smoking or Health Hungarian Foundation (SHHF), Hungary: Tibor Demjén, Judit Kiss, Piroska A. Kovacs Catalan Institut of Oncology (ICO); Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Spain: Esteve Fernández, Yolanda Castellano, Marcela Fu, Sarah O. Nogueira, Olena Tigova Kings College London (KCL), United Kingdom: Ann McNeill, Katherine East, Sara C. Hitchman Cancer Prevention Unit and WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany: Ute Mons, Sarah Kahnert University of Athens (UoA), Greece: Yannis Tountas, Panagiotis Behrakis, Filippos T. Filippidis, Christina Gratziou, Paraskevi Katsaounou, Theodosia Peleki, Ioanna Petroulia, Chara Tzavara Aer Pur Romania, Romania: Antigona C. Trofor, Marius Eremia, Lucia Lotrean, Florin Mihaltan European Respiratory Society (ERS), Switzerland; Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany: Gernot Rohde, Tamaki Asano, Claudia Cichon, Amy Far, Céline Genton, Melanie Jessner, Linnea Hedman, Christer Janson, Ann Lindberg, Beth Maguire, Sofia Ravara, Valérie Vaccaro, Brian Ward Maastricht University, the Netherlands: Marc Willemsen, Hein de Vries, Karin Hummel, Gera E. Nagelhout Health Promotion Foundation (HPF), Poland: Witold A. Zatoński, Aleksandra Herbeć, Kinga Janik-Koncewicz, Krzysztof Przewoźniak, Mateusz Zatoński University of Waterloo (UW); Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada: Geoffrey T. Fong, Thomas K. Agar, Pete Driezen, Shannon Gravely, Anne C. K. Quah, Mary E. Thompson
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Exposure to anti-smoking advertising and its effects differ across countries. This study examines the reported exposure to anti-smoking advertising among smokers and its relation to knowledge of smoking harms and quit attempts in six European countries.

Methods:
Data come from Wave 1 of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) 6 European Country (6E) Survey (Germany, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Spain) carried out among smokers between June and September 2016 (n=6011). Key measures included whether participants had noticed anti-smoking advertising in the last six months in 6 different channels, their knowledge of 13 adverse smoking/second-hand smoking health effects and if they had made at least one quit attempt in the last 12 months. Multivariate logistic regression models were used in the analysis.

Results:
Across the six countries, only 35.2% of smokers reported being exposed to any anti-smoking advertising. Television was the most common channel identified (25.7%), followed by newspapers and magazines (13.8%), while social media were the least reported (9.5%). Participants 18–24 years old were significantly more likely to have noticed advertisements on the Internet than participants >55 years old (24.3% vs 4.9%; OR=5.15). Participants exposed to anti-smoking advertising in all six channels were twice more likely to have a higher knowledge of smoking risks than those not exposed (2.4% vs 97.6%, respectively; OR=2.49). The likelihood of making a quit attempt was increased by 10% for each additional channel through which smokers were exposed to anti-smoking advertising.

Conclusions:
Knowledge of health risks of smoking tended to be higher in countries that aired a campaign in recent years. Exposure to anti-smoking advertising, in the six channels combined, was related to higher smoking knowledge of risks and to more quit attempts. Future anti-smoking mass media campaigns should consider advertising in all dissemination channels to increase the awareness of the dangers of smoking.

 
REFERENCES (34)
1. World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2015: Raising taxes on tobacco. http:// www.who.int/tobacco/global_rep.... Published, 2015. Accessed February 26, 2018.
2. World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
3. World Health Organization. Guidelines for Implementation of Article 12 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (Education, Communication, Training and Public Awareness). http://www.who.int/fctc/ guidelines/Decision.pdf. Published, 2010. Accessed May 30, 2018.
4. Wakefield MA, Loken B, Hornik RC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet. 2010;376(9748):1261-1271. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60809-4
5. Durkin S, Brennan E, Wakefield M. Mass media campaigns to promote smoking cessation among adults: an integrative review. Tob Control. 2012;21(2):127-138. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050345
6. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2017. Country profile: Germany. http://www.who.int/tobacco/sur... country_profile/deu.pdf?ua=1. Published, 2017. Accessed February 26, 2018.
7. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2017. Country profile: Romania. http://www.who.int/tobacco/sur... country_profile/rou.pdf?ua=1. Accessed January 20, 2018.
8. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2017. Country profile: Poland. http:// www.who.int/tobacco/surveillan... profile/pol.pdf?ua=1. Published, 2017. Accessed February 26, 2018.
9. European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention. European Regulatory Science on Tobacco: Policy implementation to reduce lung diseases (EURESTPLUS). https://eurestplus.eu. Published, 2016. Accessed January 22, 2018.
10. Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC. OJ 2014 L 127/1.2001.
11. Vardavas CI, Bécuwe N, Demjén T, et al. Study Protocol of European Regulatory Science on Tobacco (EURESTPLUS): Policy implementation to reduce lung disease. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 2018;16(Suppl 2:A2). doi:10.18332/tid/93305
12. European Commission. Special Eurobarometer 429. Attitudes of Europeans towards Tobacco. Publications Office of the EU. 2015. doi:10.2875/670456
13. Fong GT, Thompson ME, Boudreau C, et al. The Conceptual Model and Methods of Wave 1 (2016) of the EUREST-PLUS ITC 6 European Countries Survey. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 2018;16(Suppl 2:Α3). doi:10.18332/tid/99881
14. Yang J, Hammond D, Driezen P, Fong GT, Jiang Y. Health knowledge and perception of risks among Chinese smokers and non-smokers: findings from the Wave 1 ITC China Survey. Tob Control. 2010;19 Suppl 2:i18-i23. doi:10.1136/tc.2009.029710
15. Zawahir S, Omar M, Awang R, et al. Effectiveness of antismoking media messages and education among adolescents in Malaysia and Thailand: findings from the International Tobacco Control Southeast Asia project. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(2):482-491. doi:10.1093/ntr/nts161
16. Wakefield MA, Spittal MJ, Yong H-H, Durkin SJ, Borland R. Effects of mass media campaign exposure intensity and durability on quit attempts in a population-based cohort study. Health Educ Res. 2011;26(6):988-997. doi:10.1093/her/cyr054
17. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2017: Monitoring tobacco use and prevention policies. http://apps.who.int/iris/ bitstream/10665/255874/1/9789241512824-eng. pdf?ua=1&ua=1. Published, 2017. Accessed January 13, 2018.
18. Vardavas CI, Symvoulakis EK, Connolly GN, Patelarou E, Lionis C. What defines an effective anti-tobacco TV advertisement? A pilot study among Greek adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7(1):78-88. doi:10.3390/ijerph7010078
19. European Commission. Standard Eurobarometer 84: Media use in the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/ commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/ResultDoc/ download/DocumentKy/72667. Published, 2016. Accessed November 23, 2018.
20. Gilpin E, White M, White V, et al. Tobacco Control Successes in California: A Focus on Young People, Results from the California Tobacco Surveys, 1990- 2002. http://libraries.ucsd.edu/ssds... cpc00007/2002FINAL_RPT.pdf. Published, 2003. Accessed March 11, 2018.
21. Biener L, Nyman A, Roman AM, Flynn CA, Albers AB. Massachusetts Adult Tobacco Survey: Tobacco use and attitudes after seven years of The Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program, Technical Report & Tables 1993 - 2000. https://scholarworks.umb.edu/c.... cgi?article=1002&context=csr_pubs. Published, 2001. Accessed January 28, 2017.
22. National Cancer Institute. The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. Tobacco Control Monograph No 19: The Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use. http://www.cancercontrol. cancer.gov/tcrb/monographs/19/.... Published, 2008. Accessed February 14, 2018.
23. Naslund JA, Kim SJ, Aschbrenner KA, et al. Systematic review of social media interventions for smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 2017;73:81-93. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.002
24. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2017. Country profile: Greece. http:// www.who.int/tobacco/surveillan... profile/grc.pdf?ua=1. Published, 2017. Accessed February 26, 2018.
25. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2017. Country profile: Hungary. http://www.who.int/tobacco/sur... country_profile/hun.pdf?ua=1. Published, 2017. Accessed February 26, 2018.
26. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2017. Country profile: Spain. http:// www.who.int/tobacco/surveillan... profile/esp.pdf?ua=1. Published, 2017. Accessed February 26, 2018.
27. Niederdeppe J, Farrelly MC, Hersey JC, Davis KC. Consequences of dramatic reductions in state tobacco control funds: Florida, 1998-2000. Tob Control. 2008;17(3):205-210. doi:10.1136/tc.2007.024331
28. Sly DF, Arheart K, Dietz N, et al. The outcome consequences of defunding the Minnesota youth tobaccouse prevention program. Prev Med. 2005;41(2):503-510. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.11.027
29. Wakefield MA, Durkin S, Spittal MJ, et al. Impact of tobacco control policies and mass media campaigns on monthly adult smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(8):1443-1450. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.128991
30. Friend K, Levy DT. Reductions in smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption associated with mass-media campaigns. Health Educ Res. 2002;17(1):85-98. doi:10.1093/her/17.1.85
31. Zatoński M, Stokłosa M. Report from the seminar on the past, present, and future of tobacco control, Harvard University Department of the History of Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts, October 2016’. J Heal Inequalities. 2017;3(1):16-23. doi:10.5114/jhi.2017.69160
32. Krohn MD, Lizotte AJ, Phillips MD, Thornberry TP, Bell KA. Explaining systematic bias in self-reported measures: factors that affect the under- and over-reporting of self-reported arrests. Justice Q. 2013;30(3):501-528. doi:10.1080/07418825.2011.606226
33. Cunningham JA, Selby PL. How you assess quit attempts for smoking makes a big difference to your results. Addiction. 2008;103(11):1761-1762. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02353.x
34. Vangeli E, Stapleton J, Smit ES, Borland R, West R. Predictors of attempts to stop smoking and their success in adult general population samples: a systematic review. Addiction. 2011;106(12):2110-2121. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03565.x
 
CITATIONS (1):
1. Knowledge of the health risks of smoking and impact of cigarette warning labels among tobacco users in six European countries: Findings from the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys
Antigona Trofor, Sophia Papadakis, Lucia Lotrean, Cornel Radu-Loghin, Marius Eremia, Florin Mihaltan, Pete Driezen, Christina Kyriakos, Ute Mons, Tibor Demjén, Sarah Nogueira, Esteve Fernández, Yannis Tountas, Krzysztof Przewoźniak, Ann McNeill, Geoffrey Fong, Constantine Vardavas, on behalf of the EUREST-PLUS consortium*
Tobacco Induced Diseases
eISSN:1617-9625