CONFERENCE PROCEEDING
Regulatory gaps in tobacco product definitions for nicotine products: A comparative analysis in the WHO Western Pacific Region
More details
Hide details
1
Noncommunicable Diseases Prevention and Health Promotion Unit, World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines
2
World Health Organization, London, United Kingdom
Publication date: 2025-06-23
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2025;23(Suppl 1):A135
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:The rapid evolution and proliferation of
nicotine-containing products, including e-cigarettes,
challenge tobacco control regulation. This study
examines how legislative definitions of tobacco products
in countries of the WHO Western Pacific Region (WPR)
address nicotine-containing products.
METHODS:A qualitative comparative analysis of laws
from 24 of 27 countries in the WHO WPR was conducted
in November 2024. Definitions of 'tobacco products' were
categorized by reference to ingredients and nicotine
delivery methods (e.g., smoking, chewing, snuffing,
inhaling). Related terms, such as tobacco, electronic
nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), and imitation tobacco
products, were analyzed to identify regulatory gaps in
addressing nicotine products alongside comprehensive
tobacco control.
RESULTS:Of the 24 countries, 83.3% (n=20) define
tobacco products with reference to the tobacco plant,
with ten specifically referencing tobacco leaves, leaving
gaps for products with nicotine from other parts of the
plant or synthetic sources. Six countries extend 'tobacco
product' definitions to nicotine products, but two limit this
to tobacco-derived nicotine. Four adopt broader definitions
covering nicotine products regardless of source. Three
countries explicitly classify ENDS as tobacco products
but no other nicotine products, such as nicotine pouches.
Methods of use are specified in eight countries (37.5%),
but three omit inhaling, leaving potential loopholes
for products marketed as suitable for inhalation. Eight
countries regulate e-cigarettes using terms separate from
tobacco product, such as vaping product or imitation
tobacco product, with their ability to address e-cigarettes
depending on how tobacco control measures apply to
these separate categories.
CONCLUSIONS:Current definitions often fail to
encompass all tobacco and nicotine products. A broader
definition addressing nicotine delivery by any means and
including substances, such as synthetic nicotine and new
substances designed to simulate tobacco and nicotine
product use, is critical for futureproofing regulations. This
analysis provides insights to strengthen tobacco control
laws and combat tobacco and nicotine addiction more
effectively.