Recent manuscripts
Archive
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Open Access
Indexing
Contact us
Authorship & COI
Publication Ethics
Data Policies
Supporting Diversity
Instructions to authors (PDF)
Manuscript Types
Manuscript Formatting
Professional Editing Service
How to submit
Supplements & Special Issues
Preprints
TID on Twitter
Evaluation of health warnings for waterpipe tobacco smoking among university students in the Eastern Mediterranean region
| 1 | American University of Beirut, Lebanon |
| 2 | Birzeit University, State of Palestine |
| 3 | Sultan Qaboos University, Oman |
| 4 | Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain |
| 5 | Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan |
| 6 | Ain Shams University, Egypt |
| 7 | Dubai Medical College, United Arab Emirates |
| 8 | University of Florida, United States of America |
Publication date: 2018-03-01
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A767
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
Download abstract book (PDF)ABSTRACT
Background:
Waterpipe tobacco smoking is a global public health problem that originated in the Eastern Mediterranean region (EMR). It is highly prevalent among university students, and has been increasing in popularity despite mounting evidence showing it is harmful to health. The aim of this study was to evaluate responses to various health warning messages and their location on waterpipe devices, among young residents of EMR countries.
Methods:
Adult university students who were waterpipe smokers completed an Internet-based survey across 5 EMR countries (Egypt [N=728], Jordan [N=790], Oman [N=117], Palestine [N=772], and UAE [N=180]). The survey evaluated their responses to text-only and pictorial waterpipe-specific health warnings and their location on waterpipe devices.
Results:
Among both text-only warnings and text + pictorial warnings, messages that communicated harm to children were rated highest in raising concerns about the health consequences of smoking and in motivating smokers to think about quitting. In terms of warning location, the mouthpiece was rated as most noticeable to smokers.
Conclusions:
This study is the first to compare responses to waterpipe-specific health warnings across EMR countries. Requiring health warnings on waterpipe devices may be an effective policy to educate smokers about the consequences of waterpipe use.
Waterpipe tobacco smoking is a global public health problem that originated in the Eastern Mediterranean region (EMR). It is highly prevalent among university students, and has been increasing in popularity despite mounting evidence showing it is harmful to health. The aim of this study was to evaluate responses to various health warning messages and their location on waterpipe devices, among young residents of EMR countries.
Methods:
Adult university students who were waterpipe smokers completed an Internet-based survey across 5 EMR countries (Egypt [N=728], Jordan [N=790], Oman [N=117], Palestine [N=772], and UAE [N=180]). The survey evaluated their responses to text-only and pictorial waterpipe-specific health warnings and their location on waterpipe devices.
Results:
Among both text-only warnings and text + pictorial warnings, messages that communicated harm to children were rated highest in raising concerns about the health consequences of smoking and in motivating smokers to think about quitting. In terms of warning location, the mouthpiece was rated as most noticeable to smokers.
Conclusions:
This study is the first to compare responses to waterpipe-specific health warnings across EMR countries. Requiring health warnings on waterpipe devices may be an effective policy to educate smokers about the consequences of waterpipe use.
RELATED ARTICLE
