CONFERENCE PROCEEDING
Corporate accountability in tobacco farming: A case study of worker injury and legal precedent in Brazil
 
More details
Hide details
1
Center for Studies on Tobacco and Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
 
2
Legal Department, The Guardians of Nature Institute, Prudentópolis, Brazil
 
 
Publication date: 2025-06-23
 
 
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2025;23(Suppl 1):A131
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Tobacco farming poses serious health risks to workers, yet the industry has historically avoided accountability. This case study examines the story of a Brazilian former tobacco farmer, diagnosed with polyneuropathy from chronic pesticide exposure, who is now pursuing legal action against the company she worked for.
METHODS: The analysis draws on legal documents and journalistic reports published between 2015 and 2024.
RESULTS: From an early age, the farmer experienced acute pesticide poisoning symptoms. In 2007, after three decades of exposure, she collapsed while applying pesticides and was permanently unable to return to work. In 2012, she was diagnosed with organophosphate-induced delayed polyneuropathy, a degenerative condition characterized by cramping pain, numbness, and tingling in the lower limbs, progressing to muscle weakness and reduced reflexes, with potential effects on the upper limbs. This Brazilian farmer lost the use of her lower limbs.
Her permanent disability was confirmed by a medical report in 2015, prompting her to file a lawsuit against the tobacco corporation she had worked with. Both the lower and appellate courts ruled in her favor, establishing a causal link between the polyneuropathy and her work in tobacco farming, and recognizing the employment relationship with the company.
The court ordered the corporation to provide ongoing financial support to cover essential medical treatment expenses. The company has appealed the decision to the Superior Labor Court, and the case is currently scheduled for a final ruling.
CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the need for greater oversight and accountability regarding working conditions and health risks in tobacco fields. The court ruling in favor of the farmer may set a precedent for others in similar situations.
eISSN:1617-9625
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top