RESEARCH PAPER
The association between senior student tobacco use rate at school and alternative tobacco product use among junior students in Canadian secondary schools
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Adam G Cole   

School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
Publication date: 2014-05-01
 
Tobacco Induced Diseases 2014;12(May):8
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
The use of alternative tobacco products (ATPs) has grown in popularity among Canadian youth. This study examined the association between a school-level characteristic (the senior student tobacco use rate) and the current use of manufactured cigarettes, little cigars or cigarillos, cigars, roll-your-own cigarettes, smokeless tobacco (SLT), and a hookah among junior students.

Methods:
This study used nationally representative Canadian data from 29,495 students in grades 9 to 12 as part of the 2010/2011 Youth Smoking Survey. For each ATP, we described rates of senior and junior tobacco use, calculated the variance attributed to school-level factors, and examined the association between the senior student (grades 11 and 12) tobacco use rate and the current use of each ATP among junior students (grades 9 and 10) while accounting for relevant student-level characteristics. SAS 9.3 was used for all analyses.

Results:
Over half of schools sampled had senior students that reported using each ATP. School-level differences accounted for between 14.1% and 29.7% of the variability in ATP current use among junior students. Each one percent increase in the number of senior students at a school that currently use manufactured cigarettes, SLT, or a hookah was significantly independently associated with an increased likelihood that a junior student at that school currently used manufactured cigarettes (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06), SLT (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.24), or a hookah (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.14).

Conclusions:
Characteristics of the school environment a junior student attends appear to play an important role in ATP use, and tobacco control programs and policies should be designed to ensure that they include strategies to curb the use of all tobacco products. Additional evidence is needed for the impact of comprehensive school-based tobacco control approaches.

 
REFERENCES (34)
1.
Reid JL, Hammond D, Rynard VL, Burkhalter R: Tobacco Use in Canada: Patterns and Trends, 2014 Edition. 2014, Waterloo, ON: Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo.
 
2.
Connolly GN, Alpert HR: Trends in the use of cigarettes and other tobacco products, 2000–2007. JAMA. 2008, 299: 2629-2630. 10.1001/jama.299.22.2629.
 
3.
Richter P, Caraballo R, Gupta N, Pederson LL: Exploring use of non-traditional tobacco products through focus groups with young adult smokers, 2002. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008, 5 (3): 1-8.
 
4.
Soldz A, Dorsey E: Youth attitudes and beliefs toward alternative tobacco products: cigars, bidis, and kreteks. Health Educ Behav. 2005, 32: 549-566. 10.1177/1090198105276219. doi:10.1177/1090198105276219.
 
5.
Akl EA, Gaddam S, Gunukula SK, Honeine R, Jaoude PA, Irani J: The effects of waterpipe tobacco smoking on health outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Epidemiol. 2010, 39: 834-857. 10.1093/ije/dyq002. doi:10.1093/ije/dyq002.
 
6.
Engeland A, Haldorsen T, Andersen A, Tretli S: The impact of smoking habits on lung cancer risk: 28 years’ observation of 26,000 Norwegian men and women. Cancer Causes Control. 1996, 7: 366-376. 10.1007/BF00052943.
 
7.
Iribarren C, Tekawa IS, Sidney S, Friedman GD: Effect of cigar smoking on the risk of cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer in men. N Engl J Med. 1999, 340 (23): 1773-1780. 10.1056/NEJM199906103402301.
 
8.
Rodu B, Jansson C: Smokeless tobacco and oral cancer: a review of the risks and determinants. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004, 15 (5): 252-263. 10.1177/154411130401500502. doi:10.1177/154411130401500502.
 
9.
Tobacco Strategy Advisory Group: Building on our gains, taking action now: Ontario’s Tobacco Control Strategy for 2011–2016.http://www.mhp.gov.on.ca/en/sm....
 
10.
Czoli CD, Leatherdale ST, Rynard V: Bidi and Hookah use among Canadian youth: findings from the 2010 Canadian youth smoking survey. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013, 10:120290. http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd1....
 
11.
Leatherdale ST, Rios P, Elton-Marshall T, Burkhalter R: Cigar, cigarillo, and little cigar use among Canadian youth: are we underestimating the magnitude of this problem?. J Prim Prev. 2011, 32: 161-170. 10.1007/s10935-011-0248-6. doi:10.1007/s10935-011-0248-6.
 
12.
Loukas A, Batanova MD, Velazquez CE, Lang WJ, Sneden GG, Pasch KE, Karn SS, Robertson TR: Who uses snus? A study of Texas adolescents. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012, 14 (5): 626-630. 10.1093/ntr/ntr205.
 
13.
Murnaghan DA, Leatherdale ST, Sihvonen M, Kekki P: A multilevel analysis examining the association between school-based smoking policies, prevention programs and youth smoking behavior: evaluating a provincial tobacco control strategy. Health Educ Res. 2008, 23 (6): 1016-1028.
 
14.
Baillie LE, Lovato CY, Taylor E, Rutherford MB, Smith M: The pit and the pendulum: the impact on teen smokers of including a designated smoking area in school tobacco control policy. Health Educ Res. 2008, 23 (6): 1008-1015.
 
15.
Leatherdale ST, McDonald PW, Jolin M, Cameron R, Brown KS: A multi-level analysis examining how smoking friends, parents, and older students in the school environment are risk factors for susceptibility to smoking among non-smoking elementary school youth. Prev Sci. 2006, 7 (4): 397-402. 10.1007/s11121-006-0049-y.
 
16.
Lovato CY, Zeisser C, Campbell S, Watts AW, Halpin P, Thompson M, Eyles J, Adlaf E, Brown S: Adolescent smoking: Effect of school and community characteristics. Am J Prev Med. 2010, 39 (6): 507-514. 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.019.
 
17.
Sinha DN, Gupta PC, Warren CW, Asma S: School policy and tobacco use by students in Bihar, India. Indian J Public Health. 2004, 48 (3): 118-122.
 
18.
Elton-Marshall T, Leatherdale ST, Manske SR, Wong K, Ahmed R, Burkhalter R: Research Methods of the Youth Smoking Survey (YSS). Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2011, 32: 47-54.
 
19.
Leatherdale ST, Burkhalter R: The substance use profile of Canadian youth: exploring the prevalence of alcohol, drug and tobacco use by gender and grade. Addict Behav. 2012, 37: 318-322. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.10.007.
 
20.
Leatherdale ST, Rynard V: A cross-sectional examination of modifiable risk factors for chronic disease among a nationally representative sample of youth: are Canadian students graduating high school with a failing grade for health?. BMC Public Health. 2013, 13: 569-10.1186/1471-2458-13-569. doi:10.1186/10.1186/1471-2458-13-569.
 
21.
SAS Institute Inc: The SAS System for Windows: Version 9.3. 2011, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
 
22.
Government of Ontario: Smoke-Free Ontario Act. S.O. 1994,http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/ht..., Chapter 10.
 
23.
Kobus K: Peers and adolescent smoking. Addiction. 2003, 98 (Suppl. 1): 37-55.
 
24.
Tyas SL, Pederson LL: Psychosocial factors related to adolescent smoking: a critical review of the literature. Tob Control. 1998, 7: 409-420. 10.1136/tc.7.4.409.
 
25.
DiFranza JR, Coleman M: Sources of tobacco for youths in communities with strong enforcement of youth access laws. Tob Control. 2001, 10: 323-328. 10.1136/tc.10.4.323.
 
26.
Forster J, Chen V, Blaine T, Perry C, Toomey T: Social exchange of cigarettes by youth. Tob Control. 2003, 12: 148-154. 10.1136/tc.12.2.148.
 
27.
Alexander C, Piazza M, Mekos S, Valente T: Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking. J Adolesc Health. 2001, 29: 22-30. 10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00210-5.
 
28.
Ennett ST, Flewelling RL, Lindrooth RC, Norton EC: School and neighborhood characteristics associated with school rates of alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use. J Health Soc Behav. 1997, 38 (1): 55-71. 10.2307/2955361.
 
29.
Doubeni CA, Li W, Fouayzi H, DiFranza JR: Perceived accessibility as a predictor of youth smoking. Ann Fam Med. 2008, 6: 323-330. 10.1370/afm.841. doi:10.1370/afm.841.
 
30.
Go M-H, Green HD, Kennedy DP, Pollard M, Tucker JS: Peer influence and selection effects on adolescent smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010, 109: 239-242. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.12.017.
 
31.
Hoffman BR, Monge PR, Chou C-P, Valente TW: Perceived peer influence and peer selection on adolescent smoking. Addict Behav. 2007, 32: 1546-1554. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.11.016.
 
32.
Øverland S, Aarø LE, Lindbak RL: Associations between schools’ tobacco restrictions and adolescents’ use of tobacco. Health Educ Res. 2010, 25 (5): 748-756. 10.1093/her/cyq023.
 
33.
Pierce JP, Choi WS, Gilpin EA, Farkas AJ, Merritt RK: Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States. Health Psychol. 1996, 15 (5): 355-361.
 
34.
Fendrich M, Mackesy-Amiti ME, Johnson TP, Hubbell A, Wislar JS: Tobacco-reporting validity in an epidemiological drug-use survey. Addict Behav. 2005, 30: 175-181. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.04.009.
 
 
CITATIONS (4):
1.
Prevalence and characteristics of water-pipe smoking in Canada: results from the Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey
P. Abdullah, C. Costanian, N. Khanlou, H. Tamim
Public Health
 
2.
The prevalence and trends of waterpipe tobacco smoking: A systematic review
Mohammed Jawad, Rana Charide, Reem Waziry, Andrea Darzi, Rami A. Ballout, Elie A. Akl, Lion Shahab
PLOS ONE
 
3.
An examination of the shift in school-level clustering of US adolescent electronic cigarette use and its multilevel correlates, 2011–2013
Daniel J. Corsi, Adam M. Lippert
Health & Place
 
4.
Exploring the association between E-cigarette retailer proximity and density to schools and youth E-cigarette use
Adam Cole, Sarah Aleyan, Scott Leatherdale
Preventive Medicine Reports
 
eISSN:1617-9625