RESEARCH PAPER
Stakeholders' opinions about a tobacco policy in Lao PDR
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Public Health Sciences, division of Social Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
2
National Institute of Public Health, Vientiane, Lao PDR
3
Stockholm Centre for Public Health, Tobacco Prevention, Stockholm, Sweden
Publish date: 2009-01-14
 
Tobacco Induced Diseases 2009;5(January):2
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The global epidemic of tobacco smoking is expected to impact hardest in low- and middle- income countries (LMIC). There is a lack of understanding regarding the policy environments within which tobacco control policies are being introduced particularly in LMIC. This study aims at exploring key stakeholders' beliefs about a tobacco policy in Lao PDR. This is a qualitative case study with a standardised open-ended questionnaire answered by eleven stakeholders in leading positions within different ministries and the media, donors and NGOs. Themes included the perception of tobacco among professionals, awareness of tobacco as a public health issue, importance of inter-sectoral cooperation, and obstacles faced in implementing policies. The research team included both outsiders and an insider. Analysis was done using the case and cross-case analysis. Among the respondents there was consensus regarding the positive impact of a national tobacco policy with the exception of the representative from the Ministry of Agriculture. Stakeholders identified education, awareness creation through media and law enforcement as important interventions, followed by taxation. Education should be diversified in the way it should be delivered. It was emphasized that people in rural areas and minority groups need tailored made approaches. A major limiting factor in moving tobacco control forward in LMIC was stated to be the lack of funding. The refusal by tobacco industry to participate in the study is noteworthy. It is essential to draft a national tobacco policy that can help the government to increase taxes, and create adequate provisions for the enforcement of tobacco laws and regulations.
 
REFERENCES (20)
1.
WHO report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2008: The MPOWER package. 2008, Geneva, World Health Organisation.
 
2.
The World Bank: Curbing the Epidemic: Governments and the economic of tobacco control. 1999, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
 
3.
Yach D, Wipfli H: A century of smoke. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2006, 100: 465-479. 10.1179/136485906X97462.
 
4.
Regulation on health warnings printed on cigarette packs and cartons (No 661/MoH/2006).
 
5.
Regulation on establishment of smoke free areas for the National University of Lao PDR (No 3174/NUOL/06).
 
6.
Global Analysis Project Team: Political economy of tobacco control in low-income and middle-income countries: lessons learned from Thailand and Zimbabwe. Bull World Health Organ. 2000, 78: 913-919.
 
7.
Patton MQ: How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. 1987, Sage Publications, Beverley Hills CA.
 
8.
Patton MQ: Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 1990, Sage Publications, Beverley Hills CA, 2.
 
9.
Yin R: Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2.
 
10.
Clarke A, Dawson R: Evaluation research: An introduction of principles, methods and practice. 1999, Sage Publications, London.
 
11.
Rossi P, Freeman H, Lipsey M: Evaluation a systematic approach. 1999, Sage Publications, Beverley Hills CA, 6.
 
12.
Walt G, Shiffman J, Schneider H, Murray SF, Brugha R, Gilson L: Doing health policy analysis: methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges. Health Policy Plan. 2008, 23: 308-317. 10.1093/heapol/czn024.
 
13.
Walt G, Gilson L: Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Policy Plan. 1994, 9: 353-370. 10.1093/heapol/9.4.353.
 
14.
Abdullah ASM, Husten CG: Promotion of smoking cessation in developing countries: a framework for urgent public health interventions. Thorax. 2004, 59: 623-630. 10.1136/thx.2003.018820.
 
15.
Shimkhada R, Peabody JW: Tobacco control in India. Bull. World Health Organ. 2003, 81: 48-52.
 
16.
Chaiton M, Rerrence R, LeGresley E: Perceptions of industry responsibility and tobacco control policy by US tobacco company executives in trial testimony. Tob Control. 2006, 15 (Suppl IV): iv98-iv106. 10.1136/tc.2004.009647.
 
17.
Ferry LH, Knutsen S, Montgomery S, Petersen F, Rudatsikira E, Singh P: Mentoring Cambodian and Lao health professionals in tobacco control leadership and research skills. Tob Control. 2006, 15 (Suppl IV): iv42-47.
 
18.
Sarantakos S: Social Research. 2005, Basingstoke, Palgrave Mc Millan, 3.
 
19.
Mc Dermott MAN, Palchanes K: A literature review of the critical elements in translation theory. IMAGE: J Nursing Scolarship. 1994, 26: 113-117. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00928.x.
 
20.
Greenhalgh T, Taylor R: How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). BMJ. 1997, 315: 740-743.
 
 
CITATIONS (5):
1.
The development of Tobacco Harm Prevention Law in Vietnam: stakeholder tensions over tobacco control legislation in a state owned industry
Hideki Higashi, Tuan A Khuong, Anh D Ngo, Peter S Hill
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
 
2.
Examining Implementation of Tobacco Control Policy at the District Level: A Case Study Analysis from a High Burden State in India
Divya Persai, Rajmohan Panda, Adyya Gupta
Advances in Preventive Medicine
 
3.
Multi-Stakeholder Taskforces in Bangladesh — A Distinctive Approach to Build Sustainable Tobacco Control Implementation
Angela Jackson-Morris, Ishrat Chowdhury, Valerie Warner, Kayleigh Bleymann
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
 
4.
Health policymakers’ knowledge and opinions of physicians smoking and tobacco policy control in Lao PDR
Vanphanom Sychareun, Alongkone Phengsavanh, Visanou Hansana, Sysavanh Phommachanh, Mayfong Mayxay, Tanja Tomson
BMC Public Health
 
5.
Smoking prevalence, determinants, knowledge, attitudes and habits among Buddhist monks in Lao PDR
Sychareun Vanphanom, Alongkon Phengsavanh, Visanou Hansana, Sing Menorath, Tanja Tomson
BMC Research Notes
 
eISSN:1617-9625