SHORT REPORT
Sociodemographic differences in reasons for ENDS use among US youth within Wave 2 of the PATH study
 
More details
Hide details
1
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
2
Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
3
Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
4
Department of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
Publish date: 2019-01-21
 
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2019;17(January):4
KEYWORDS:
TOPICS:
ABSTRACT:
Introduction:
Adolescents use electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS, or e-cigarettes) more than other tobacco products. Among adults, some data indicate that motivations for use varies by sociodemographic group. This study sought to examine how adolescents’ motivations for ENDS use varies by sociodemographic characteristics, including age, gender, race/ethnicity and household income.

Material and Methods:
The current study used data from Wave 2 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study. Youth who used ENDS in the past 30 days were asked to report their motivations for product use. Rates of reporting each reason for use were compared across sociodemographic groups.

Results:
Appealing flavors was the most commonly reported motivation for using ENDS, and was mentioned more often among females (89.23%) than males (74.00%). Females were also more likely than males to report using ENDS because the product feels like smoking cigarettes (AOR=1.761) and people who are important to the participant smoke them (AOR=1.895). Older teens were more likely to report using ENDS because the product does not smell bad (56.45%, 15–17 years old; 42.83%, 12–14 years old).

Conclusions:
Motivations for ENDS use varies by sociodemographic group. Understanding the motivations for use among sociodemographic subgroups is an initial step towards informing the development of policies and interventions with equally distributed benefits.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Meghan Bridgid Moran   
Department of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway Hampton House, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
 
REFERENCES (17):
1. Wang TW, Gentzke A, Sharapova S, Cullen KA, Ambrose B, Jamal A. Tobacco Use Among Middle and High School Students — United States, 2011–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(22):629–633. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6722a3.
2. Kong G, Kuguru KE, Krishnan-Sarin S. Gender Differences in US Adolescent E-Cigarette Use. Current Addiction Reports. 2017;4(4)422-430. doi:10.1007/s40429-017-0176-5.
3. Simon P, Camenga D, Morean M, et al. Socioeconomic status and adolescent e-cigarette use: The mediating role of e-cigarette advertisement exposure. Preventive Medicine. 2018;112:193-198. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.019.
4. Anand V, McGinty KL, O'Brien K, Guenthner G, Hahn E, Martin CA. E-cigarette use and beliefs among urban public high school students in North Carolina. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2015;57(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.03.018.
5. McNeill A, Brose LS, Calder R, Hitchman SC, Hajek P, McRobbie H. E-cigarettes: an evidence update. Public Health England. https://assets.publishing.serv.... Published August 19, 2015. Updated August 28, 2015. Accessed June 16, 2018.
6. Cheng T. Chemical evaluation of electronic cigarettes. Tobacco Control. 2014;23(2):ii11–ii17. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051482.
7. Dwyer JB, McQuown SC, Leslie FM. The Dynamic Effects of Nicotine on the Developing Brain. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2009;122(2):125-139. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.02.003.
8. Arrazola R, Dube SR, King BA. Tobacco product use middle and high school students- United States, 2011-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(45):893-897.
9. Cooper M, Harrell MB, Perry CL. Comparing young adults to older adults in e-cigarette perceptions and motivations for use: implications for health communication. Health Education Research. 2016;31(4):429-438. doi: 10.1093/her/cyw030.
10. Villanti AC, Johnson AL, Ambrose BK, et al. Flavored tobacco product use in youth and adults: Findings from the first wave of the PATH study (2013–2014). American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2017;53(2):139-151. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.026.
11. Kong G, Morean ME, Cavallo DA, Camenga DR, Krishnan-Sarin S. Reasons for Electronic Cigarette Experimentation and Discontinuation Among Adolescents and Young Adults. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2015;17(7):847-854. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu257.
12. Pulvers K, Scheuermann TS, Emami AS, et al. Reasons for Smoking Among Tri-Ethnic Daily and Nondaily Smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2014;16(12): 1567-1576. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu108.
13. Patel D, Davis KC, Cox S, et al. Reasons for current E-cigarette use among US adults. Preventive Medicine. 2016;93:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.011.
14. Pepper JK, Ribisl KM, Emery SL, Brewer NT. Reasons for starting and stopping electronic cigarette use. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014;11(10):10345-10361. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111010345.
15. Hyland A, Ambrose BK, Conway KP, Borek N, Lambert E, Carusi C, et al. Design and methods of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Tobacco Control. 2016;26(4):371-378. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052934.
16. Windle M. Drinking Over the Lifespan: Focus on Early Adolescents and Youth. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews. 2016;38(1):95-101.
17. U.S. National Cancer Institute. A Socioecological Approach to Addressing Tobacco Related Health Disparities. National Cancer Institute Tobacco Control Monograph 22. NIH Publication No. 17-CA-8035A. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2017.
eISSN:1617-9625