RESEARCH PAPER
Predictors of opinions on prison smoking bans: Analyses of survey data from Scottish staff and prisoners
Helen Sweeting 1  
,  
Sean Semple 2
,  
Ashley Brown 2
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
2
Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Helen Sweeting   

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Publish date: 2019-06-04
 
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2019;17(June):47
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Policy-makers and practitioners need to understand characteristics associated with support for smoking restrictions to identify both potential allies and groups requiring particular support/targeted communication in the face of restrictions. Using data from prison staff and prisoners, we explored the structure and correlates of opinions relating to prison smoking bans.

Methods:
Questionnaires were completed by staff (online, N=1,271; 27% return) and prisoners (paper-based; N=2,512; 34%) in all 15 Scottish prisons in 2016/17. At that time, prisoners could smoke in their own cells and during outdoor recreation; staff smoking was prohibited anywhere on prison grounds. Staff and prisoner questionnaires included identical/very similar questions around opinions on smoking in prisons and prison smoking bans, own smoking behaviour, health and sociodemographic details. We also measured fine particulate matter (PM2.5) as a proxy for second-hand smoke (SHS) levels in every prison.

Results:
Principal components analysis identified two factors: ‘Positive about bans’ (higher scores among staff) and ‘Bans will be difficult’ (higher scores among prisoners). In multivariate analyses, ‘Positive about bans’ was associated with: not smoking (both staff and prisoners); better general health, more respiratory symptoms and working in an operational role among staff; and no asthma, more sensory symptoms, higher educational level and status/release date among prisoners; ‘Bans will be difficult’, was associated with fewer sensory symptoms and lower prison SHS levels among staff, and being a smoker among prisoners. In smoker-only analyses, heavier smokers were less positive about bans and more likely to believe bans will be difficult.

Conclusions:
Results suggest it is possible to be positive about prison smoking bans whilst also recognising and/or concerned about potential operational difficulties, and that these opinions are associated with several characteristics additional to smoker status. Support for future prison bans may be stronger if staff have access to objective SHS exposure measures.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to the staff and prisoners who completed the surveys and staff at the Scottish Prison Service and at the two non-SPS-run prisons (HMP Addiewell and HMP Kilmarnock) who assisted with the study, including the air quality measurements. We thank colleagues at MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Public Health Research Facility for help with data management and input (in particular D. Walker, K. Campbell and M. Tolan). We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of our TIPs co-investigators to the overall design of the study (L. Bauld, K. Boyd, P. Conaglen, P. Craig, D. Eadie, A. Leyland and J. Pell). We particularly thank S. Corbett, L. Dorward, R. Parker and members of the SPS Research Advisory Group for their helpful input during the design and conduct of this research.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none was reported.
FUNDING
The TIPs study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research Programme (project number 15/55/44). The authors acknowledge funding from the Medical Research Council (MC_UU12017/12 and MC_PC_13027 to ED) and Chief Scientist Office (SPHSU12). The views and opinions expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Public Health Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.
AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS
H.S., S.S. and E.D. are Co-Investigators and K.H. Principal Investigator of the Tobacco In Prisons study (TIPs) and therefore all contributed to the overall design, methods and materials of the study. H.S. and K.H. managed the staff and prisoner surveys and S.S. led on the secondhand smoke measurements. H.S. conceived and conducted the analyses presented here and first-drafted the paper. All authors contributed to subsequent drafts and approved submission.
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Öberg M, Jaakkola M, Woodward A, Peruga A, Prüss-Ustün A. Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries. The Lancet. 2011;377:139-146. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61388-8.
 
2.
Pell J, Haw S. The triumph of national smoke-free legislation. Heart. 2009;95:1377-1379. doi:10.1136/hrt.2009.176230.
 
3.
Burns S, Hart E, Jancey J, Hallett J, Crawford G, Portsmouth L. A cross sectional evaluation of a total smoking ban at a large Australian university. BMC Research Notes. 2016;9:288. doi:10.1186/s13104-016-2090-7.
 
4.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. Evaluating the effectiveness of smoke-free policies. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO; 2009.
 
5.
Lacchetti C, Cohen J, Ashley M, et al. Is nicotine dependence related to smokers' support for restrictions on smoking? Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2001;3:257-260. doi:10.1080/14622200123996.
 
6.
Poland B, Cohen J, Ashley M, et al. Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions. Tobacco Control. 2000;9:364-371. doi:10.1136/tc.9.4.364.
 
7.
Spaulding A, Eldridge G, Chico C, et al. Smoking in Correctional Settings Worldwide: Prevalence, Bans, and Interventions. Epidemiologic Reviews. 2018;40:82-95. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxy005.
 
8.
Brown A, Sweeting H, Logan G, Demou E, Hunt K. Prison staff and prisoner views on a prison smoking ban: evidence from the Tobacco In Prisons study. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2018. doi:10.1093/ntr/nty092.
 
9.
McAllister I. Public opinion in Australia on restricting smoking in public places. Tobacco Control. 1995;4:30-35. doi:10.1136/tc.4.1.30.
 
10.
Reuband K. Tabakkonsum im gesellschaftlichen Wandel. Verbreitung des Konsums und Einstellung zu Rauchverboten, Düsseldorf 1997–2009 (Tobacco consumption in a changing society. Extent of consumption and attitudes to smoking bans, Dusseldorf 1997-2009). Gesundheitswesen. 2014;76:32-40. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1334953.
 
11.
Obeidat N, Ayub H, Bader R, et al. Public support for smoke-free policies in Jordan, a high tobacco burden country with weak implementation of policies: status, opportunities and challenges. Global Public Health. 2016;11:1246-1258. doi:10.1080/17441692.2015.1065896.
 
12.
Willemsen M, Gorts C, Van Soelen P, Jonkers R, Hilberink S. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and determinants of support for complete smoking bans in psychiatric settings. Tobacco Control. 2004;13:180-185. doi:10.1136/tc.2003.004804.
 
13.
Hilton S, Semple S, Miller B, et al. Expectations and changing attitudes of bar workers before and after the implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:206. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-206.
 
14.
Meijer E, Gebhardt W, Dijkstra A, Willemsen M, Van Laar C. Quitting smoking: the importance of non-smoker identity in predicting smoking behaviour and responses to a smoking ban. Psychology and Health. 2015;30:1387-1409. doi:10.1080/08870446.2015.1049603.
 
15.
Zlatev M, Pahl S, White M. Perceived risk and benefit for self and others as predictors of smokers' attitudes towards smoking restrictions. Psychology and Health. 2010;25:167-182. doi:10.1080/08870440802372449.
 
16.
McCaffrey M, Goodman P, Gavigan A, et al. Should Any Workplace Be Exempt from Smoke-Free Law: The Irish Experience. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/545483.
 
17.
Carpenter M, Hughes J, Solomon L, Powell T. Smoking in correctional facilities: a survey of employees. Tobacco Control. 2001;10:38-42. doi:10.1136/tc.10.1.38.
 
18.
Buth S, Stover H, Ritter C. Tabakprävention in Gefängnissen (Tobacco prevention in prisons: a survey among prisoners on tobacco use and the possibilities and obstacles regarding the reduction of smoking in prison). Suchttherapie. 2013;14:160-169. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1348250.
 
19.
Hehir AM, Indig D, Prosser S, Archer VA. Implementation of a smoke-free policy in a high secure mental health inpatient facility: staff survey to describe experience and attitudes. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:315. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-315.
 
20.
Dickens G, Stubbs J, Popham R, Haw C. Smoking in a forensic psychiatric service: a survey of inpatients' views. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2005;12:672-678. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2005.00892.x.
 
21.
Haller E, McNiel DE, Binder RL. Impact of a smoking ban on a locked psychiatric unit. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1996;57:329-332.
 
22.
Semple S, Sweeting H, Demou E, Logan G, O'Donnell R, Hunt K. Characterising the exposure of prison staff to second-hand tobacco smoke. Annals of Work Exposures and Health. 2017;61:809-821. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxx058.
 
23.
Scottish Prison Service. Scottish Prison Service Annual Report & Accounts 2016-2017. Edinburgh: Scottish Prison Service; 2017.
 
24.
Carnie J, Broderick R, Cameron J, Downie D, Williams G. Prisoner Survey 2017. Edinburgh: Scottish Prison Service; 2017.
 
25.
West R, Usher M. Is the ten-item Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (QSU-brief) more sensitive to abstinence than shorter craving measures? Psychopharmacology. 2010;208:427-432. doi:10.1007/s00213-009-1742-x.
 
26.
Christie S, McLean J. The Scottish Health Survey 2016 edition. Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2017.
 
27.
Eisner M, Smith A, Blanc P. Bartenders’ respiratory health after establishment of smoke-free bars and taverns. Journal of American Medical Assocation. 1998;280:1909-1914. doi:10.1001/jama.280.22.1909.
 
28.
The EuroQol Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199-208. doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9.
 
29.
Ritter C, Stöver H, Levy M, Etter JF, Elger B. Smoking in prisons: the need for effective and acceptable interventions. Journal of Public Health Policy. 2011;32:32-45. doi:10.1057/jphp.2010.47.
 
30.
Cropsey KL, Kristeller JL. The effects of a prison ban on smoking behavior and withdrawal symptoms. Addictive Behaviors. 2005;30:589-594. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.07.003.
 
eISSN:1617-9625