Recent manuscripts
Archive
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Open Access
Indexing
Contact us
Authorship & COI
Principles of Transparency Checklist
Publication Ethics
Crossmark
Data Policies
Supporting Diversity
Instructions to authors (PDF)
Manuscript Types
Manuscript Formatting
How to submit
Special Publications & Reprints
Preprints
TID on Twitter
RESEARCH PAPER
Positive and instructive anti-smoking messages speak to older smokers: a focus group study
| 1 | Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA |
| 2 | Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Janine K Cataldo
Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California San Francisco, Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, USA
Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California San Francisco, Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, USA
Submission date: 2014-07-17
Acceptance date: 2015-01-05
Publication date: 2015-01-24
Tobacco Induced Diseases 2015;13(January):2
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Smokers over the age of 45 are the only group with an increase in smoking prevalence, are the least likely to quit smoking, and bear most of the burden of tobacco-related disease. Research characterizing older adult perceptions of warning labels and anti-tobacco messages has not been reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to describe whether older smokers perceived warning labels and anti-tobacco messages as effective for the promotion of smoking cessation. A secondary aim was to explore what types of messages and message delivery formats are most relevant to older adult smokers.
Methods:
This focus group study is part of a larger study to characterize older smokers’ perceptions of the risks and benefits associated with conventional and emerging tobacco products and determine the extent to which these perceptions relate to exposure to pro- and anti-tobacco messages. From April 2013 to August 2014 we conducted eight focus groups with 51 current and former smokers a focus group study in urban and suburban California. A semi-structured format about current use of conventional and emerging tobacco products was used. Participants were asked to recall and comment on examples of warning labels and anti-tobacco messages. Data were transcribed and thematically coded.
Results:
Warning labels and anti-smoking messages were seen as ineffective for smoking cessation motivation among older California smokers. Positive framed anti-tobacco messages were identified as most effective. Text-only warnings were seen as ineffective due to desensitizing effects of repeated exposure. Negative messages were described as easy to ignore, and some trigger urges to smoke. Older adults are knowledgeable about the risks and health effects of smoking. However, they tend to be less knowledgeable about the benefits of cessation and may underestimate their ability to quit.
Conclusions:
These findings suggest that messages with a positive frame that outline immediate and long-term benefits of cessation would be an effective approach for long-term smokers. Current anti-tobacco messaging was generally not seen as effective for smoking cessation among long-term smokers.
Smokers over the age of 45 are the only group with an increase in smoking prevalence, are the least likely to quit smoking, and bear most of the burden of tobacco-related disease. Research characterizing older adult perceptions of warning labels and anti-tobacco messages has not been reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to describe whether older smokers perceived warning labels and anti-tobacco messages as effective for the promotion of smoking cessation. A secondary aim was to explore what types of messages and message delivery formats are most relevant to older adult smokers.
Methods:
This focus group study is part of a larger study to characterize older smokers’ perceptions of the risks and benefits associated with conventional and emerging tobacco products and determine the extent to which these perceptions relate to exposure to pro- and anti-tobacco messages. From April 2013 to August 2014 we conducted eight focus groups with 51 current and former smokers a focus group study in urban and suburban California. A semi-structured format about current use of conventional and emerging tobacco products was used. Participants were asked to recall and comment on examples of warning labels and anti-tobacco messages. Data were transcribed and thematically coded.
Results:
Warning labels and anti-smoking messages were seen as ineffective for smoking cessation motivation among older California smokers. Positive framed anti-tobacco messages were identified as most effective. Text-only warnings were seen as ineffective due to desensitizing effects of repeated exposure. Negative messages were described as easy to ignore, and some trigger urges to smoke. Older adults are knowledgeable about the risks and health effects of smoking. However, they tend to be less knowledgeable about the benefits of cessation and may underestimate their ability to quit.
Conclusions:
These findings suggest that messages with a positive frame that outline immediate and long-term benefits of cessation would be an effective approach for long-term smokers. Current anti-tobacco messaging was generally not seen as effective for smoking cessation among long-term smokers.
REFERENCES (38)
4.
Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults--United States, 2005–2012 [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/previe...].
5.
Califonia Health Officer’s Report on Tobacco Use and Promotion in California [http://www.cdph.ca.gov/Documen...].
6.
Ng M, Freeman MK, Fleming TD, Robinson M, Dwyer-Lindgren L, Thomson B, et al. Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980–2012. JAMA. 2014;311:183–92.
7.
Dawel A, Anstey KJ. Interventions for midlife smoking cessation: a literature review. Aust Psychol. 2011;46:190–5.
8.
Yerger VB, Malone RE. African American leadership groups: smoking with the enemy. Tob Control. 2002;11:336–45.
9.
Muggli ME, Pollay RW, Lew R, Joseph AM. Targeting of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders by the tobacco industry: results from the Minnesota Tobacco Document Depository. Tob Control. 2002;11:201–9.
10.
Apollonio DE, Malone RE. Marketing to the marginalised: tobacco industry targeting of the homeless and mentally ill. Tob Control. 2005;14:409–15.
11.
Cataldo JK, Malone RE. False promises: the tobacco industry, “low tar” cigarettes, and older smokers. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:1716–23.
12.
Cataldo JK. Clinical implications of smoking and aging: breaking through the barriers. J Gerontol Nurs. 2007;33:32–41.
13.
Sepe E, Ling PM, Glantz SA. Smooth moves: bar and nightclub tobacco promotions that target young adults. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:414–9.
14.
Al-Delaimy WK, Pierce JP, Messer K, White MM, Trinidad DR, Gilpin EA. The California Tobacco Control Program’s effect on adult smokers: (2) Daily cigarette consumption levels. Tob Control. 2007;16:91–5.
15.
Anderson SJ, Glantz SA, Ling PM. Emotions for sale: cigarette advertising and women’s psychosocial needs. Tob Control. 2005;14:127–35.
16.
Pierce JP. Tobacco industry marketing, population-based tobacco control, and smoking behavior. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:S327–34.
17.
Hammond D, Fong GT, Borland R, Cummings KM, McNeill A, Driezen P. Text and graphic warnings on cigarette packages: findings from the international tobacco control four country study. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32:202–9.
18.
Hammond D, Fong GT, McNeill A, Borland R, Cummings KM. Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006;15(Suppl 3:iii):19–25.
19.
Flash Eurobarometer No. 253 Survey on Tobacco Analytical Report. [http://ec.europa.eu/public_opi...].
20.
Vardavas CI, Connolly G, Karamanolis K, Kafatos A. Adolescents perceived effectiveness of the proposed European graphic tobacco warning labels. Eur J Public Health. 2009;2:212–7.
21.
Miller CL, Hill DJ, Quester PG, Hiller JE. Impact on the Australian Quitline of new graphic cigarette pack warnings including the Quitline number. Tob Control. 2009;18:235–7.
22.
Moodie C, MacKintosh AM, Hammond D. Adolescents’ response to text-only tobacco health warnings: results from the 2008 UK Youth Tobacco Policy Survey. Eur J Public Health. 2010;20:463–9.
23.
Hammond D. Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review. Tob Control. 2011;20:327–37.
24.
Borland R, Wilson N, Fong GT, Hammond D, Cummings KM, Yong HH, et al. Impact of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packs: findings from four countries over five years. Tob Control. 2009;18:358–64.
25.
Hitchman SC, Driezen P, Logel C, Hammond D, Fong GT. Changes in effectiveness of cigarette health warnings over time in Canada and the United States, 2002–2011. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;5:536–43.
26.
Huang J, Chaloupka FJ, Fong GT. Cigarette graphic warning labels and smoking prevalence in Canada: a critical examination and reformulation of the FDA regulatory impact analysis. Tob Control. 2014;Suppl 1:i7–12.
27.
Bala M, Strzeszynski L, Cahill K. Mass media interventions for smoking cessation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;1:1–69.
28.
Durkin S, Brennan E, Wakefield M. Mass media campaigns to promote smoking cessation among adults: an integrative review. Tob Control. 2012;21:127–38.
29.
Notthoff N, Carstensen LL. Positive health message framing promotes increased walking behaviour in older adults. Int J Psychol. 2012;47:284.
30.
Shamaskin AM, Mikels JA, Reed AE. Getting the message across: age differences in the positive and negative framing of health care messages. Psychol Aging. 2010;25:746–51.
31.
Devlin E, Anderson S, Hastings G, Macfadyen L. Targeting smokers via tobacco product labelling: opportunities and challenges for Pan European health promotion. Health Promot Int. 2005;20:41–9.
32.
Kang Y, Cappella JN, Strasser AA, Lerman C. The effect of smoking cues in antismoking advertisements on smoking urge and psychophysiological reactions. Niotine Tob Res. 2009;3:254–61.
33.
Lee S, Cappella JN, Lerman C, Strasser AA. Effects of smoking cues and argument strength of antismoking advertisements on former smokers’ self-efficacy, attitude, and intention to refrain from smoking. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15:527–33.
34.
Carter BL, Tiffany ST. Meta analysis of cue reactivity in addiction research. Addiction. 1999;94:327–40.
35.
Shiffman S, Gwaltney CJ, Balabanis MH, Liu KS, Paty JA, Kassel JD, et al. Immediate antecedents of cigarette smoking: an analysis from ecological momentary assessment. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002;111:531.
36.
Falcone M, Lerman C, Cappella JN, Sanborn P, Jepson C, Strasser AA. No untoward effects of smoking cues in anti-smoking public service announcements. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;133:279–82.
37.
Bradley B, Field M, Mogg K, De Houwer J. Attentional and evaluative biases for smoking cues in nicotine dependence: component processes of biases in visual orienting. Behav Pharmacol. 2004;15:29–36.
38.
Waters AJ, Shiffman S, Bradley BP, Mogg K. Attentional shifts to smoking cues in smokers. Addiction. 2003;98:1409–17.
CITATIONS (11):
1.
Older African American Homeless-Experienced Smokers’ Attitudes Toward Tobacco Control Policies—Results from the HOPE HOME Study
Maya Vijayaraghavan, Pamela Olsen, John Weeks, Karma McKelvey, Claudia Ponath, Margot Kushel
American Journal of Health Promotion
Maya Vijayaraghavan, Pamela Olsen, John Weeks, Karma McKelvey, Claudia Ponath, Margot Kushel
American Journal of Health Promotion
2.
Identifying Persuasive Public Health Messages to Change Community Knowledge and Attitudes About Bulimia Nervosa
Siân A. McLean, Susan J. Paxton, Robin Massey, Phillipa J. Hay, Jonathan M. Mond, Bryan Rodgers
Journal of Health Communication
Siân A. McLean, Susan J. Paxton, Robin Massey, Phillipa J. Hay, Jonathan M. Mond, Bryan Rodgers
Journal of Health Communication
3.
Addiction Treatment Clients’ Reactions to Graphic Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs
Anna Pagano, Noah Gubner, Barbara Tajima, Deborah Yip, Catherine Henderson, Joseph Guydish
Journal of Drug Issues
Anna Pagano, Noah Gubner, Barbara Tajima, Deborah Yip, Catherine Henderson, Joseph Guydish
Journal of Drug Issues
5.
Qualitative study of Singaporean youths’ perception of antismoking campaigns: what works and what does not
Shazana Shahwan, Restria Fauziana, Pratika Satghare, Janhavi Vaingankar, Louisa Picco, Siow Ann Chong, Mythily Subramaniam
Tobacco Control
Shazana Shahwan, Restria Fauziana, Pratika Satghare, Janhavi Vaingankar, Louisa Picco, Siow Ann Chong, Mythily Subramaniam
Tobacco Control
6.
Adult smokers’ perceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation: a focus group study
Crawford Moodie
Tobacco Control
Crawford Moodie
Tobacco Control
7.
Opinions of women from deprived communities on national tobacco control measures in England
Anjum Memon, John Barber, Emma Rumsby, Samantha Parker, Lisa Mohebati, Richard O. de Visser, Susan Venables, Anna Fairhurst, Kate Lawson, Josefin Sundin
Journal of Substance Use
Anjum Memon, John Barber, Emma Rumsby, Samantha Parker, Lisa Mohebati, Richard O. de Visser, Susan Venables, Anna Fairhurst, Kate Lawson, Josefin Sundin
Journal of Substance Use
8.
Creating a Theoretically Grounded, Gamified Health App: Lessons From Developing the Cigbreak Smoking Cessation Mobile Phone Game
Elizabeth A Edwards, Hope Caton, Jim Lumsden, Carol Rivas, Liz Steed, Yutthana Pirunsarn, Sandra Jumbe, Chris Newby, Aditi Shenvi, Samaresh Mazumdar, Jim Q Smith, Darrel Greenhill, Chris J Griffiths, Robert T Walton
JMIR Serious Games
Elizabeth A Edwards, Hope Caton, Jim Lumsden, Carol Rivas, Liz Steed, Yutthana Pirunsarn, Sandra Jumbe, Chris Newby, Aditi Shenvi, Samaresh Mazumdar, Jim Q Smith, Darrel Greenhill, Chris J Griffiths, Robert T Walton
JMIR Serious Games
9.
To smoke or not to smoke? A qualitative study among young adults
Lionel Pourtau, Elise Martin, Gwenn Menvielle, Khoury-Lesueur El, Maria Melchior
Preventive Medicine Reports
Lionel Pourtau, Elise Martin, Gwenn Menvielle, Khoury-Lesueur El, Maria Melchior
Preventive Medicine Reports
10.
Comparing cigarette smoking knowledge and attitudes among smokers and non-smokers
Chadia Haddad, Hala Sacre, Aline Hajj, Nathalie Lahoud, Zeina Akiki, Marwan Akel, Danielle Saade, Rouba Zeidan, Rita Farah, Souheil Hallit, Pascale Salameh
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Chadia Haddad, Hala Sacre, Aline Hajj, Nathalie Lahoud, Zeina Akiki, Marwan Akel, Danielle Saade, Rouba Zeidan, Rita Farah, Souheil Hallit, Pascale Salameh
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
11.
Ignoring our elders: tobacco control’s forgotten health equity issue
Tim McAfee, Ruth Malone, Janine Cataldo
Tobacco Control
Tim McAfee, Ruth Malone, Janine Cataldo
Tobacco Control
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.