SHORT REPORT
Monitoring secondhand tobacco smoke remotely in real-time: A simple low-cost approach
Ruaraidh Dobson 1  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Scotland, United Kingdom
2
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Ruaraidh Dobson   

Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Scotland, United Kingdom
Publish date: 2019-03-05
 
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2019;17(March):18
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Secondhand smoke (SHS) in the home is a serious cause of ill-health, especially for children. SHS indoors can be indirectly measured using particulate matter monitors, and interventions have been developed using feedback from these monitors to encourage smoke-free homes. These interventions often use data that are several days out of date, as the data must be downloaded manually from monitors. It would be advantageous to access this information remotely in real-time to provide faster feedback to intervention participants.

Methods:
Using off-the-shelf computer components and the Dylos DC1700 air quality monitor, a portable internet-connected monitor was developed that can send data to a server remotely. Four of these monitors were tested in homes in Israel to test the reliability of the connection. Data were downloaded from the monitor’s onboard memory and compared to the data sent to the server.

Results:
Eight homes were monitored for 4 to 6 days, with a combined total count of 44 days. Less than 1% of data was lost, with no outage lasting longer than 1 hour 45 minutes. There was no significant difference in the mean concentrations measured in homes between mobile-transmitted data and data downloaded directly.

Conclusions:
This system appears to be a reliable way to monitor remotely home air quality for use in intervention studies, and could potentially have applications in other related research. Laboratories that own Dylos DC1700s may wish to consider converting them to such a system to obtain a cost-effective way of overcoming limitations in the Dylos design.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank V Myers and T Galili of Tel Aviv University for their assistance in recruiting participants in Israel.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no competing interests, financial or otherwise, related to the current work. R Dobson reports grants from the UK Academy of Medical Sciences, during the conduct of the study. LJ Rosen reports grants from the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute, outside the submitted work. The other author has also completed and submitted an ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest.
FUNDING
This research was supported by a Daniel Turnberg Travel Fellowship award from the Academy of Medical Sciences (Grant number: DTF009\1173).
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
 
REFERENCES (21)
1.
US Surgeon General. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US) 2006. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu.... Accessed April 13, 2016.
 
2.
Wilson I, Semple S, Mills LM, et al. REFRESH-reducing families’ exposure to secondhand smoke in the home: a feasibility study. Tob Control. 2013;22:e8. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050212.
 
3.
Marsh J, McNeill A, Lewis S, et al. Protecting children from secondhand smoke: a mixed-methods feasibility study of a novel smoke-free home intervention. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016;2:53. doi:10.1186/s40814-016-0094-7.
 
4.
Ratschen E, Thorley R, Jones L, et al. A randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce children’s exposure to secondhand smoke in the home. Tob Control. 2017. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053279.
 
5.
Dobson R, O’Donnell R, de Bruin M, Turner S, Semple S. Using air quality monitoring to reduce second-hand smoke exposure in homes: the AFRESH feasibility study. Tob Prev Cessation. 2017;3(June). doi:10.18332/tpc/74645.
 
6.
Rosen LJ, Myers V, Winickoff JP, Kott J. Effectiveness of Interventions to Reduce Tobacco Smoke Pollution in Homes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(12):16043-16059. doi:10.3390/ijerph121215038.
 
7.
Semple S, Turner S, O’Donnell R, et al. Using air-quality feedback to encourage disadvantaged parents to create a smoke-free home: Results from a randomised controlled trial. Environ Int. 2018;120:104-110. doi:10.1016/J.ENVINT.2018.07.039.
 
8.
Semple S, Apsley A, MacCalman L. An inexpensive particle monitor for smoker behaviour modification in homes. Tob Control. 2013;22(5):295-298. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050401.
 
9.
Rosen L, Zucker D, Hovell M, et al. Feasibility of Measuring Tobacco Smoke Air Pollution in Homes: Report from a Pilot Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(12):15129–15142. doi:10.3390/ijerph121214970.
 
10.
Klepeis NE, Hughes SC, Edwards RD, et al. Promoting smoke-free homes: a novel behavioral intervention using real-time audio-visual feedback on airborne particle levels. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e73251. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073251.
 
11.
Yang SH. Internet of Things. In: Wireless Sensor Networks. Signals and Communication Technology. Springer, London;2014:247–761. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-5505-8_12.
 
12.
Sousan S, Koehler K, Hallett L, Peters TM. Evaluation of consumer monitors to measure particulate matter. J Aerosol Sci. 2017;107:123-133. doi:10.1016/J.JAEROSCI.2017.02.013.
 
13.
Raspberry Pi Foundation. Raspberry Pi. https://www.raspberrypi.org/. Accessed December 28, 2017.
 
14.
Koehler KA, Peters TM. New Methods for Personal Exposure Monitoring for Airborne Particles. Curr Environ Heal Reports. 2015;2(4):399-411. doi:10.1007/s40572-015-0070-z.
 
15.
Semple S, Ibrahim AE, Apsley A, Steiner M, Turner S. Using a new, low-cost air quality sensor to quantify second-hand smoke (SHS) levels in homes. Tob Control. 2015;24(2):153-158. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051188.
 
16.
Python Software Foundation. Python Language Reference, version 2.7. Python Softw. Found; 2013.
 
17.
PythonAnywhere LLP. PythonAnywhere. https://www.pythonanywhere.com. Accessed February 27, 2018.
 
18.
Dobson R. DylosPi. Atlassian BitBucket. https://bitbucket.org/johnnyfi.... Accessed September 19, 2018.
 
19.
IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24.0; 2016.
 
20.
Klepeis NE, Apte MG, Gundel LA, Sxtro RG, Nazaroff WW. Determining Size-Specific Emission Factors for Environmental Tobacco Smoke Particles. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2003;37:780-790. doi:10.1080/02786820300914.
 
21.
Dobson R, Semple S. “How do you know those particles are from cigarettes?”: An algorithm to help differentiate second-hand tobacco smoke from background sources of household fine particulate matter. Environ Res. 2018;166:344-347. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.019.
 
eISSN:1617-9625