Incentive-based interventions for smoking cessation: early findings from the SMILE Trial in Thailand
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of California San Francisco, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, United States of America
2
Mahidol University, Institute for Population and Social Research, Thailand
3
University of California-Berkley, School of Public Health, United States of America
Publish date: 2018-03-01
 
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A857
KEYWORDS:
WCTOH
 
TOPICS:
Download abstract book (PDF)

ABSTRACT:
Background:
Smoking cessation services are not widely available in many low-resource settings. In this study, we tested several incentive-based interventions in a scalable workplace setting in a middle-income country.

Methods:
We undertook a cluster randomized controlled trial of factories located in the metropolitan area of Bangkok, Thailand. We randomly assigned 101 worksites from 84 companies (n=4,241 smokers) to treatment arms that varied on two cross-randomized factors: presence of a deposit contract and type of bonus (none, individual, or team). The deposit contract required a minimum deposit of about $3 in a tamper-proof personal box, with voluntary contributions thereafter. A participant forfeited all deposits if he or she failed to abstain from smoking at 3 months. The individual bonus involved a payment for abstaining of either $20 or $40, randomly varied by worksite. The team bonus involved a $40 payment if the person and a randomly assigned teammate each abstained. An additional arm included a deposit contract plus a teammate, but without any further incentives. All arms received smoking cessation counseling. All incentives depended on smoking status at 3 months, with biochemically verified abstinence collected at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results:
Intervention take-up was high across all arms, notably >50% in deposit arms. Biochemically verified 7-day smoking abstinence at 6 months was highest in the $40 individual bonus arm, a 72% (9 percentage point) increase relative to the control group. There were no strong interaction effects between deposits and the bonus, nor large team effects. Relapse was low following the end of the incentives.

Conclusions:
This study advances the literature on the use of deposit contracts and social and monetary incentives to promote smoking cessation in low-resource settings. It provides some of the first rigorous evidence on the value of supplementing a basic deposit contract with individual and social incentives.

eISSN:1617-9625