RESEARCH PAPER
In-person retail marketing claims in tobacco and E-cigarette shops in Southern California
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Health Science, California State University, Fullerton, USA
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Joshua S. Yang   

Department of Health Science, California State University, 800 N. State College Blvd., KHS 161A, Fullerton, CA 92834, USA
Publication date: 2017-06-17
 
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2017;15(June):28
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
E-cigarette use has been increasing in the United States, though knowledge of potential risks and harms associated with e-cigarette use is low. Marketing of e-cigarettes may serve as a source of information to shape beliefs and attitudes toward e-cigarettes. The purpose of this study was to identify the most common marketing claims made within “vape” and tobacco shops in sales interactions with customers in demographically diverse cities.

Methods:
Vape and tobacco shops from three diverse cities in Southern California were selected for inclusion in the study. From May 2015 to July 2015, simulated customers asked salespeople in vape and tobacco shops how e-cigarettes compare to conventional cigarettes, and then recorded the resulting claims that were made using a standardized form designed for this purpose. Data were analyzed from January to March 2016.

Results:
The most frequent claims made by sales staff were that: smoking e-cigarettes helps one quit smoking (57% of the simulated shopping interactions), e-cigarettes come in multiple flavors (54%), and e-cigarettes are healthier than conventional cigarettes (50%). Simulated customer interactions that took place in vape shops included more positive marketing claims than those that occurred in tobacco shops; this relationship approached statistical significance (p = .087). There was a significant relationship between city and the average number of positive e-cigarette claims made (p < .001).

Conclusions:
A wide range of marketing claims are made about e-cigarettes in retail settings. These may vary by geographic location, community demographics, and type of retail outlet.

 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2016.
 
2.
King BA, Patel R, Nguyen KH, et al. Trends in awareness and use of electronic cigarettes among U.S. adults, 2010-2013. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015; doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu191.
 
3.
McMillen RC, Gottleib MA, Whitmore Shaefer RM, et al. Trends in electronic cigarette use among U.S. adults: use is increasing in both smokers and nonsmokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(10):1195–202.
 
4.
Arrazola RA, Singh T, Corey CG, et al. Tobacco use among middle and high school students – United States, 2011-2014. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2015;64(14):381–5.
 
5.
Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Miech RA, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the future National Survey Results on Drug use, 1975–2015: overview. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; 2016.
 
6.
Bhatnagar A, Whitsel LP, Ribisl KM, et al. Electronic cigarettes. A policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;130:1418–36.
 
7.
Lee YO, Kim AE. ‘Vape shops’ and E-cigarette lounges’ open across the USA to promote ENDS. Tob Control. 2015;24:410–2.
 
8.
Cheney MK, Gowin M, Franklin WT. Vape store owner beliefs and messages to customers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(5):694–9.
 
9.
Hart JL, Walker KL, Sears CG, et al. Vape shop employees: public health advocates? Tob Prev Cessation. 2016;2(Supplement):3.
 
10.
Allem J-P, Unger JB, Garcia R, et al. Tobacco attitudes and behaviors of vape shops retailers in Los Angeles. Am J Health Behav. 2015;39(6):794798.
 
11.
Cheney M, Gowin M, Franklin WT. Marketing practices of vape store owners. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:e16–21.
 
12.
Sussman S, Allem J-P, Garcia J, et al. Who walks into vape shops in Southern California?: a naturalistic observation of customers. Tob Induc Dis. 2016;14:18.
 
13.
Wagener TL, Shaikh RA, Meier, et al. Examining the smoking and vaping behaviors and preferences of vape shop customers. Tob Prev Cessation. 2016;2(Supplement):5.
 
14.
Sussman S, Garcia R, Cruz TB, et al. Consumers’ perceptions of vape shops in Southern California: an analysis of online Yelp reviews. Tob Induc Dis. 2014;12(22):9.
 
15.
Sanders-Jackson AN, Tan ASL, Bigman CA, Henriksen L. Knowledge about e-cigarette constituents and regulation: results from a national survey of U.S. young adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(10):247–1254.
 
16.
Smith DM, Bansal-Tavers M, O’Connor RJ, et al. Associations between perceptions of e-cigarette advertising and interest in product trial amongst U.S. adult smokers and non-smokers: results from an internet-based pilot survey. Tob Induc Dis. 2015;13:14. doi:10.1186/s12971-015-0039-6.
 
17.
Pokhrel P, Fagan P, Kehl L, Herzog TA. Receptivity to e-cigarette marketing, harm perceptions, and e-cigarette use. Am J Health Behav. 2014;39(1):121–31.
 
18.
California Department of Public Health. California Tobacco Control Program, California Tobacco Facts and Figures 2016. Sacramento: California Department of Public Health; 2016.
 
19.
California Department of Education. California Healthy Kids Survey, 2013–14: main report. San Francisco: WestEd Health & Human Development Program for the California Department of Education; 2014.
 
20.
Rhodes KV, Miller FG. Simulated patient studies: an ethical analysis. Milbank Q. 2012;90(4):706–24.
 
21.
U.S. Census Bureau. American FactFinder. http://factfinder.census.gov/f.... Accessed 8 May 2017.
 
22.
Martell BN, Garrett BE, Caraballo RS. Disparities in adult cigarette smoking — United States, 2002–2005 and 2010–2013. MMWR Morb mortal wkly rep. 2016;65:753–758. DOI. http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmw....
 
23.
Oliver P. Purposive sampling. In: Jupp V, editor. The SAGE dictionary of social research methods. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2006. p. 245.
 
24.
Vo LT, Danico MY. The formation of post-suburban communities: Koreatown and little Saigon, Orange County. Int J Sociol Social Policy. 2004;24(7/8):15–45.
 
25.
Gonzalez ER. Latino City: urban planning, politics, and the grassroots. New York: Routledge; 2017.
 
26.
Callan LB. Adapting the windshield survey model to community health education. HSMHA Health Rep. 1971 Mar;86(3):202–3.
 
27.
Grana RA, Ling PM. “Smoking revolution”: a content analysis of electronic cigarette retail websites. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(4):395–403.
 
28.
Timberlake DS, Pechmann C, Tran SY, Au V. A content analysis of camel Snus advertisements in print media. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13(6):431–9.
 
29.
Weber RP. Basic content analysis. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1990.
 
30.
Friese S. Atlas.Ti 7 user manual. Berlin: Scientific Software Development GmbH; 2015.
 
 
CITATIONS (3):
1.
A new form of nicotine retailers: a systematic review of the sales and marketing practices of vape shops
Joseph G L Lee, Elizabeth N Orlan, Kerry B Sewell, Kurt M Ribisl
Tobacco Control
 
2.
Electronic cigarette use in youths: a position statement of the Forum of International Respiratory Societies
Thomas Ferkol, Harold Farber, Grutta La, Frank Leone, Henry Marshall, Enid Neptune, Charlotta Pisinger, Aneesa Vanker, Myra Wisotzky, Gustavo Zabert, Dean Schraufnagel
European Respiratory Journal
 
3.
A qualitative exploration of information-seeking by electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) users in New Zealand
Lindsay Robertson, Janet Hoek, Mei-Ling Blank, Rosalina Richards, Pamela Ling, Lucy Popova, Lydia McMillan
BMJ Open
 
eISSN:1617-9625