Harm perception among Swedish daily smokers regarding nicotine, NRT-products and Swedish Snus
Tom Wikmans 1  
More details
Hide details
Research Group for Societal and Information Studies (FSI), Stockholm, Sweden
Institute for Tobacco Studies (ITS), Stockholm, Sweden
Tom Wikmans   

Research Group for Societal and Information Studies (FSI), Ingemarsgatan 4B, Stockholm, Sweden
Publish date: 2010-08-13
Tobacco Induced Diseases 2010;8(August):9
In Sweden NRT-products and Snus, are easily available and used as smoking cessation aids. However, most quit attempts are made without any cessation aids. The limited use of these products as cessation aids may be influenced by the way smokers perceive the harmfulness of NRT-products and Snus compared to smoking. The present study examines these perceptions and their association with perceptions of the harmfulness of nicotine itself

The study is based on the Swedish part of a two-nation web-based survey of daily smokers in Sweden (n = 1016) and Norway (n = 1000). Questionnaire items addressed perceptions of NRT-products’ and Snus’ harmfulness and nicotine’s part of the health risks of smoking. Data analyses included cross-tabulations and logistic regressions.

A majority, 59% of the answers to the question about harmfulness of NRT-products, and 75% of the answers about harmfulness of Snus, were inconsistent with the scientific evidence by demonstrating exaggerated perceptions of harmfulness. The strongest predictor of consistent answers was the perception of the harmfulness of nicotine. There were also significant associations with own experience of successful use of the products in question. Overall the perceptions of the harmfulness of nicotine were considerably exaggerated. This pattern was more pronounced among women than men. Prevailing misperceptions may be related to the way that different tobacco and nicotine products are presented in the media and other publicly available information sources.

Public information about smoking and health should be expanded to include objective and unambiguous information regarding nicotine’s part in the harmfulness of smoking and the harmfulness of different nicotine-containing products compared to smoking. This is essential in order to preclude that misperceptions regarding these matters could discourage smokers from adopting effective cessation practices with use of nicotine-containing aids.

1. Foulds J, Ramström L, Burke M, Fagerström K: Effect of smokeless tobacco (Snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden. Tobacco Control. 2003, 12: 349-59. 10.1136/tc.12.4.349.
2. Paulsson K, Karlsson AS, Wadman C: Health on equal terms. Results from National Public Health Survey - 2008 (Swedish title: Hälsa på lika villkor. Resultat från Nationella folkhälsoenkäten - 2008). 2008, [].
3. Stead LF, Perera R, Bullen C, Mant D, Lancaster T: Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008, 1: CD000146.
4. Fiore MC: Clinical Practice Guideline. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence:. 2008, [] Update. US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, May 2008.
5. Furberg H, Bulik MC, Lerman C, Lichtenstein P, Pedersen LN, Sullivan FP: Is Swedish Snus associated with smoking initiation or smoking cessation?. Tobacco Control. 2005, 14: 422-424. 10.1136/tc.2005.012476.
6. Gilliam H, Galanti R: Role of snus (oral moist snuff) in smoking cessation and smoking reduction in Sweden?. Addiction. 2003, 98: 1183-1189. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00379.x.
7. Ramström L, Foulds J: Role of Snus in initiation and cessation of tobacco smoking in Sweden. Tobacco Control. 2006, 15: 210-214. 10.1136/tc.2005.014969.
8. Lindström M: Nicotine replacement therapy, professional therapy, snuff use and tobacco smoking: a study of smoking cessation strategies in southern Sweden. Tobacco Control. 2007, 16: 410-416. 10.1136/tc.2006.019539.
9. Sommar M: (Accessed: 2009, November 11), [].
10. Levy D: The Relative Risks of a Low-Nitrosamine Smokeless Tobacco Product Compared with Smoking Cigarettes: Estimates of a Panel of Experts. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers Prevention. 2004, 13 (12): 2035-42.
11. Royal College of Physicians of London. Nicotine addiction in Britain: a report of the Tobacco Advisory Group of the Royal College of Physicians. 2000, Royal College of Physicians of London. London.
12. Royal College of Physicians of London, Tobacco Advisory Group: Protecting smokers, saving lives: the case for a tobacco and nicotine regulatory authority. 2002, London: Royal College of Physicians of London. London.
13. Royal College of Physicians of London, Tobacco Advisory Group: Harm reduction in nicotine addiction: helping people who can't quit. 2007, Royal College of Physicians of London. London.
14. Royal College of Physicians of London, Tobacco Advisory Group: Ending tobacco smoking in Britain: Radical strategies for prevention and harm reduction in nicotine addiction. 2008, Royal College of Physicians of London. London.
15. Rosén M: Public health in the future - tendencies, problems and unanswered questions. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2005, 34 (S67): 257-265.
16. Gartner CE, Hall WD, Vos T, Bertram MY, Wallace AL, Lim SS: Assessment of Swedish snus for tobacco harm reduction: an epidemiological modelling study. Lancet. 2007, 369 (9578): 2010-4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60677-1.
17. Thomas WI, Thomas DS: The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. 1928, New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation.
18. Smith S: Harm perception of nicotine products in college freshmen. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2007, 9 (9): 977-82. 10.1080/14622200701540796.
19. Bansal M: Stop-smoking medications: who uses them, who misuses them, and who is misinformed about them?. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2004, 6 (Suppl 3): S303-10. 10.1080/14622200412331320707.
20. Zillmann D, Bryant J: Selective Exposure Phenomena. Selective Exposure to Communication. 1985, Lawrence Erlbaum associates, publishers, Hillside, New Jersey London, 1-10.
21. Klapper JT: The effects of mass communication. 1960, Glencoe: The free press.
22. Hwang Y: Selective Exposure and Selective Perception of Anti-tobacco Campaign Messages: The Impacts of Campaign Exposure on Selective Perception. Health Communication. 2010, 25: 182-190. 10.1080/10410230903474027.
23. Wijnbladh O: Twice the risk for snus users to get cancer. (Swedish title: Dubbelt så stor risk för snusare att få cancer. Dagens Nyheter. 2007, 10: 9.
24. Atterstam I: Snus can be useful for smokers. (Swedish title: Snuset kan vara nyttigt för rökare). Svenska Dagbladet. 2007, 10: 6.
25. Peiper N: University faculty perceptions of the health risks related to cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. Drug and Alcohol Review. 2010, 29: 121-130. 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00143.x.
26. Levy T: Exploring Scenarios to Dramatically Reduce Smoking Prevalence: A Simulation Model of the Three-Part Cessation Process. American Journal of Public Health. 2010.
1. Commentary on Lund et al. (2011): Consolidating the evidence on effectiveness of snus for smoking cessation - implications for public health
2. Population-based survey of cessation aids used by Swedish smokers
Lars E Rutqvist
Harm Reduction Journal
3. How do consumers perceive differences in risk across nicotine products? A review of relative risk perceptions across smokeless tobacco, e-cigarettes, nicotine replacement therapy and combustible cigarettes
Christine D Czoli, Geoffrey T Fong, Darren Mays, David Hammond
Tobacco Control
4. Support for e-cigarette policies: a survey of smokers and ex-smokers in Great Britain
Leonie S Brose, Timea R Partos, Sara C Hitchman, Ann McNeill
Tobacco Control
5. Association Between Willingness to Use Snus to Quit Smoking and Perception of Relative Risk Between Snus and Cigarettes
K. E. Lund
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
6. Exploring Attitudes Regarding Smokeless Tobacco Products for Risk Reduction
Michiel A. van Zyl, Brad Rodu, Becky F. Antle, Linda K. Bledsoe, Dana J. Sullivan
Social Work in Public Health
7. Patterns of Smoking and Snus Use in Sweden: Implications for Public Health
Lars Ramström, Ron Borland, Tom Wikmans
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
8. Effects of a Fact Sheet on beliefs about the harmfulness of alternative nicotine delivery systems compared with cigarettes
Ron Borland, Lin Li, K Cummings, Richard O’Connor, Kevin Mortimer, Tom Wikmans, Lars Ramstrom, Bill King, Ann McNeill
Harm Reduction Journal
9. Perceived Health Risks of Snus and Medicinal Nicotine Products
Dorothy K. Hatsukami, R. I. Vogel, Herb H. Severson, Joni A. Jensen, Richard J. O’Connor
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
10. Perceived Relative Harm of Selected Cigarettes and Non-Cigarette Tobacco Products—A Study of Young People from a Socio-Economically Disadvantaged Rural Area in Poland
Dorota Kaleta, Kinga Polanska, Leokadia Bak-Romaniszyn, Piotr Wojtysiak
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
11. The scientific foundation for tobacco harm reduction, 2006-2011
Brad Rodu
Harm Reduction Journal
12. Trends in beliefs about the harmfulness and use of stop-smoking medications and smokeless tobacco products among cigarettes smokers: Findings from the ITC four-country survey
Ron Borland, Jae Cooper, Ann McNeill, Richard O'Connor, K Michael Cummings
Harm Reduction Journal
13. Public education about the relative harm of tobacco products: an intervention for tobacco control professionals: Table 1
Lois Biener, Amy L Nyman, Irina Stepanov, Dorothy Hatsukami
Tobacco Control
14. Insufficient knowledge about use of multiple tobacco/nicotine products
Lars Ramström
Addictive Behaviors
15. Patterns of Dual Use of Snus and Cigarettes in a Mature Snus Market
K. E. Lund, A. McNeill
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
16. How people think about the chemicals in cigarette smoke: a systematic review
Jennifer C. Morgan, M. Justin Byron, Sabeeh A. Baig, Irina Stepanov, Noel T. Brewer
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
17. How Social Care Beneficiaries in Poland Rate Relative Harmfulness of Various Tobacco and Nicotine-Containing Products
Marek Milcarz, Kinga Polańska, Leokadia Bak-Romaniszyn, Dorota Kaleta
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
18. Knowledge and Perceptions about Nicotine, Nicotine Replacement Therapies and Electronic Cigarettes among Healthcare Professionals in Greece
Anastasia Moysidou, Konstantinos Farsalinos, Vassilis Voudris, Kyriakoula Merakou, Kallirrhoe Kourea, Anastasia Barbouni
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
19. Perceptions of the health risks related to cigarettes and nicotine among university faculty
Dimple Patel, Nicholas Peiper, Brad Rodu
Addiction Research & Theory
20. Harm perceptions of electronic cigarettes and nicotine: A nationally representative cross-sectional survey of young people in Great Britain
Katherine East, Leonie S. Brose, Ann McNeill, Hazel Cheeseman, Deborah Arnott, Sara C. Hitchman
Drug and Alcohol Dependence