RESEARCH PAPER
Designing a tobacco counter-marketing campaign for African American youth
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Psychology & Counseling, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, USA
2
Cancer Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, USA
3
Danya International, Inc., Silver Spring, USA
4
Communication, Culture, & Technology Program, Georgetown University, Washington, USA
5
Catholic Schools Office, Archdiocese of Washington, Washington, USA
Publish date: 2008-07-31
 
Tobacco Induced Diseases 2008;4(August):7
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The objectives of this qualitative study were to: a) identify common marketing themes and tactics used by the tobacco industry to entice African Americans (AA's) and youth to initiate and maintain smoking behavior, especially smoking mentholated brands of cigarettes, and b) determine AA youths' knowledge, attitudes, intentions, and beliefs about smoking and the tobacco industry. Together, these activities could aid in the development of effective tobacco counter-marketing campaigns for AA youth. Using publicly available tobacco industry documents, computerized searches using standardized keywords were run and results were cataloged and analyzed thematically. Subsequently, 5 focus groups were conducted with n = 28 AA middle school-aged youth. Results suggest that the tobacco industry consistently recruited new AA smokers through a variety of means, including social and behavioral marketing studies and targeted media and promotional campaigns in predominantly AA, urban, and low income areas. AA youth interviewed in this study were largely unaware of these tactics, and reacted negatively against the industry upon learning of them. Youth tended to externalize control over tobacco, especially within the AA community. In designing a counter-marketing campaign for this population, partnering knowledge of tobacco industry practices with youth needs and community resources will likely increase their effectiveness.
 
REFERENCES (50)
1.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. 2004, Atlanta, GA. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, [http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/sgr...].
 
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Cigarette smoking among adults – United States, 2003. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2005, 54: 509-513.
 
3.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Tobacco Use Among U.S. Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups – African Americans, American Indians and Alaska Natives, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, Hispanics. A Report of the Surgeon General. 1998, Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, [http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/dat...].
 
4.
U.S. Census Bureau: State & County QuickFacts. 2000, [http://quickfacts.census.gov/q...].
 
5.
National Cancer Institute, U.S. National Institutes of Health: SEER Cancer Statistics Fact Sheets. Cancer of the Lung and Bronchus. 2005, [http://seer.cancer.gov/statfac...].
 
6.
Kelder SH, Parcel G, Perry CL: Health promotion with adolescents. Adolescent Health Problems: Behavioral Perspectives. Edited by: Wallander JL, Siegel LJ. 1995, New York: Guilford, 179-202.
 
7.
American Legacy Foundation: First Look Report 13. Cigarette Smoking Among Youth. Results from the 2002 National Youth Tobacco Survey. 2004, [http://www.americanlegacy.org/...].
 
8.
Bal DG, Lloyd JC, Roeseler A, Shimizu R: California as a model. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2001, 19: 69S-73S.
 
9.
Biener L: Adult and youth response to the Massachusetts anti-tobacco television campaign. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2000, 6 (3): 40-44.
 
10.
Hersey JC, Niederdeppe J, Ng SW, Mowery P, Farrelly M, Messeri P: How state counter-industry campaigns help prime perceptions of tobacco industry practices to promote reductions in youth smoking. Tobacco Control. 2005, 14: 377-383. 10.1136/tc.2004.010785.
 
11.
Sly DF, Heald GR, Ray S: The Florida "truth" anti-tobacco media evaluation: design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations. Tobacco Control. 2001, 10: 9-15. 10.1136/tc.10.1.9.
 
12.
Soldz S, Kreiner P, Clark TW, Krakow M: Tobacco use among Massachusetts youth: is tobacco control working?. Preventive Medicine. 2000, 31: 287-295. 10.1006/pmed.2000.0727.
 
13.
Zucker D, Hopkins RS, Sly DF, Urich J, Kershaw JM, Solari S: Florida's "truth" campaign: a counter-marketing, anti-tobacco media campaign. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2000, 6 (3): 1-6.
 
14.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Designing and Implementing an Effective Tobacco Counter-Marketing Campaign. 2003, Atlanta, GA. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
 
15.
Hershey JC, Niederdeppe J, Evans WD, Nonnemaker J, Blahut S, Holden D, Messeri P, Haviland ML: The theory of "truth": how counterindustry campaigns affect smoking behavior among teens. Health Psychology. 2005, 24: 22-31. 10.1037/0278-6133.24.1.22.
 
16.
Niederdeppe JD: Syntactic indeterminacy, perceived message sensation value-enhancing features, and message processing in the context of anti-tobacco advertisements. Communication Monographs. 2005, 72: 324-344. 10.1080/03637750500206862.
 
17.
Malone RE, Yerger V, Pearson C: Cigar risk perceptions in focus groups of urban African American youth. Journal of Substance Abuse. 2001, 13: 549-561. 10.1016/S0899-3289(01)00092-X.
 
18.
Crawford MA, Balch GI, Mermelstein R: Responses to tobacco control policies among youth. Tobacco Control. 2002, 11: 14-19. 10.1136/tc.11.1.14.
 
19.
Yerger VB, Daniel MR, Malone RE: Taking it to the streets: responses of African American young adults to internal tobacco industry documents. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2005, 7: 163-172. 10.1080/14622200412331328385.
 
20.
Balch GI, Tworek C, Barker DC, Sasso B, Mermelstein R, Giovino GA: Opportunities for youth smoking cessation: findings from a national focus group study. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2004, 6: 9-17. 10.1080/1462200310001650812.
 
21.
Okuyemi KS, Scheibmeir M, Butler J, Ahluwalia JS: Perceptions of smoking among African American light smokers. Substance Abuse. 2003, 24: 191-193. 10.1023/A:1025066312490.
 
22.
Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, National Institutes of Health: Qualitative Methods in Health Research: Opportunities and Considerations in Application and Review. 1999, [http://obssr.od.nih.gov/Docume...].
 
23.
Shervington DO: Attitudes and practices of African-American women regarding cigarette smoking: implications for interventions. Journal of the National Medical Association. 1994, 86: 337-343.
 
24.
Gittelsohn J, Roche KM, Alexander CS, Tassler P: The social context of smoking among African-American and white adolescents in Baltimore City. Ethnicity & Health. 2001, 6: 211-225. 10.1080/13557850120078134.
 
25.
Woods MN, Harris KJ, Mayo MS, Catley D, Scheibmeir M, Ahluwalia JS: Participation of African Americans in a smoking cessation trial: a quantitative and qualitative study. Journal of the National Medical Association. 2002, 94: 609-618.
 
26.
Manfredi C, Lacey L, Warnecke R, Balch G: Method effects in survey and focus group findings: understanding smoking cessation in low-SES African American women. Health Education & Behavior. 1997, 24: 786-800.
 
27.
National Association of Attorneys General: Master Settlement Agreement. 1998, [http://www.naag.org/backpages/...].
 
28.
Cummings KM, Morley CP, Horan JK, Steger C, Leavell NR: Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents. Tobacco Control. 2002, 11 (Suppl 1): I5-17.
 
29.
TobaccoDocuments.org: Tobacco Documents Online. 1999–2006. 2006, [http://tobaccodocuments.org/].
 
30.
Miles MB, Huberman AM: Qualitative Data Analysis. An Expanded Sourcebook. 1994, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2.
 
31.
Vince Cullers Advertising: "P. Lorillard & Company Marketing Plans for Newport and True Fiscal 1969–70". Bates: 03061497/1520. 1969, [http://tobaccodocuments.org/lo...].
 
32.
Johnston M: "Newport Smokers." Philip Morris memorandum. Bates: 1003415327/5342. 1982, [http://tobaccodocuments.org/pm...].
 
33.
Brady AA, Coverdale HLJr, Flagg MM, Kearney RJ: Appendix B – "The Marlboro Image Revisited." Philip Morris report. Bates: 2023045830/5889. 1971, [http://tobaccodocuments.org/pm...].
 
34.
Brown & Williamson [company]: "Kool." Brown & Williamson marketing report. Bates: 680095772/5775. 1976, [http://tobaccodocuments.org/bw...].
 
35.
Tobacco Institute, Chilcote SD: Tobacco Institute memorandum. Bates: 85694277/4279. 1985, [http://tobaccodocuments.org/lo...].
 
36.
Brown & Williamson [company]: "Resource Allocation." Brown & Williamson marketing report. Bates: 514104999/5045. 1983, [http://tobaccodocuments.org/bw...].
 
37.
Lorillard [company]: "Loews Targeting African Americans." Lorillard contract/agreement. Bates: 91762849/2850. 1991, [http://tobaccodocuments.org/lo...].
 
38.
Lorillard [company], Davis R: "Black Marketing Research – Findings & Recommended Actions to Date." Lorillard memorandum. Bates: 84274935/4944. 1978, [http://tobaccodocuments.org/lo...].
 
39.
Balbach ED, Gasior RJ, Barbeau EM: R.J. Reynolds' targeting of African Americans: 1988–2000. American Journal of Public Health. 2003, 93: 822-827.
 
40.
Okuyemi KS, Ebersole-Robinson M, Nazir N, Ahluwalia JS: African-American menthol and nonmenthol smokers: differences in smoking and cessation experiences. Journal of the National Medical Association. 2004, 96: 1208-1211.
 
41.
Pierce JP, Gilpin EA, Choi WS: Sharing the blame: smoking experimentation and future smoking-attributable mortality due to Joe Camel and Marlboro advertising and promotions. Tobacco Control. 1999, 8: 37-44.
 
42.
White VM, White MM, Freeman K, Gilpin EA, Pierce JP: Cigarette promotional offers who takes advantage?. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2006, 30: 225-231. 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.11.001.
 
43.
Delva J, Tellez M, Finlayson TL, Gretebeck KA, Siefert K, Williams DR, Ismail AI: Cigarette smoking among low-income African Americans: a serious public health problem. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005, 29: 218-220. 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.05.004.
 
44.
Kremers SP, Mudde AN, De Vries H: Model of unplanned smoking initiation of children and adolescents: an integrated stage model of smoking behavior. Preventive Medicine. 2004, 38: 642-650. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.003.
 
45.
Sutton CD, Robinson RG: The marketing of menthol cigarettes in the United States: populations, messages, and channels. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2004, 6 (Suppl 1): S83-S91. 10.1080/14622203310001649504.
 
46.
Freeman D, Brucks M, Wallendorf M: Young children's understandings of cigarette smoking. Addiction. 2005, 100: 1537-1545. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01195.x.
 
47.
Barbeau EM, DeJong W, Brugge DM, Rand WM: Does cigarette print advertising adhere to the Tobacco Institute's voluntary advertising and promotion code? An assessment. Journal of Public Health Policy. 1998, 19: 473-488. 10.2307/3343077.
 
48.
Nation M, Crusto C, Wandersman A, Kumpfer KL, Seybolt D, Morrissey-Kane E, Davino K: What works in prevention. Principles of effective prevention programs. The American Psychologist. 2003, 58: 449-456. 10.1037/0003-066X.58.6-7.449.
 
49.
Gardiner PS: African American Teen Cigarette Smoking: A Review. Changing Adolescent Smoking Prevalence: Where It Is and Why. 2001, Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 14. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, NIH Publication No. 02-5086, Chapter 14: [http://cancercontrol.cancer.go...].
 
50.
Lynch BS, Bonnie RJ, Institute of Medicine Committee on Preventing Nicotine Addiction in Children and Youths: Growing Up Tobacco Free: Preventing Nicotine Addiction in Children and Youths. 1994, Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
 
 
CITATIONS (7):
1.
Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions
Joshua Rising, Lori Alexander
Tobacco Induced Diseases
 
2.
Targeted Advertising, Promotion, and Price For Menthol Cigarettes in California High School Neighborhoods
L. Henriksen, N. C. Schleicher, A. L. Dauphinee, S. P. Fortmann
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
 
3.
How the industry is marketing menthol cigarettes: the audience, the message and the medium
Amanda Richardson, Ollie Ganz, Jennifer Pearson, Nathalie Celcis, Donna Vallone, Andrea C Villanti
Tobacco Control
 
4.
Development of the Tobacco Tactics logo: From thumb prints to press
Lee A Ewing, Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez, Devon Noonan, Sonia A Duffy
Tobacco Induced Diseases
 
5.
Social Disparities in Exposure to Point-of-Sale Cigarette Marketing
Mohammad Siahpush, Paraskevi Farazi, Jungyoon Kim, Tzeyu Michaud, Aaron Yoder, Ghada Soliman, Melissa Tibbits, Minh Nguyen, Raees Shaikh
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
 
6.
Switching Between Menthol and Nonmenthol Cigarettes: Findings From the U.S. Cohort of the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey
Karin A. Kasza, Andrew J. Hyland, Maansi Bansal-Travers, Lisa M. Vogl, Jiping Chen, Sarah E. Evans, Geoffrey T. Fong, Kenneth Michael Cummings, Richard J. O’Connor
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
 
7.
Marketing Little Cigars and Cigarillos: Advertising, Price, and Associations With Neighborhood Demographics
Jennifer Cantrell, Jennifer M. Kreslake, Ollie Ganz, Jennifer L. Pearson, Donna Vallone, Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel, Haijun Xiao, Thomas R. Kirchner
American Journal of Public Health
 
eISSN:1617-9625