RESEARCH PAPER
Cigarette ignition propensity, smoking behavior, and toxicant exposure: A natural experiment in Canada
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA
2
Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada
3
National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
Publish date: 2011-12-21
 
Tobacco Induced Diseases 2011;9(December):13
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
Background:
This study used a ‘pre-post’ research design to measure the impact of the Canadian reduced ignition propensity law on cigarette toxicity and smoking behavior among Canadian smokers.

Methods:
The study was conducted in Ontario, Canada over a ten-month period in 2005-2006, consisting of 4 laboratory visits (baseline N = 61, final N = 42). At Visit 1, questionnaire data and biospecimens were collected. During the following 24 hours, participants smoked 5 cigarettes ad libitum through a topography recording device and collected their cigarette butts. Visit 2 consisted of a questionnaire and smoking one cigarette to measure laboratory topography values. After ten months, these procedures were repeated.

Results:
Generalized estimating equations, with law status (pre and post) as a fixed within-subject factor, were used to determine changes in behavior and biomarker exposure. Overall, there were no significant differences in smoking topography, breath carbon monoxide, and saliva cotinine pre-post law (p>0.1). However, analyses revealed a significant increase in the summed concentrations of hydroxyfluorene metabolites (N = 3),, and 1-hydroxypyrene in urine, with at notable increase in hydroxyphenanthrene metabolites (N = 3) (pΣhydroxyfluorene = 0.013, 22% increase; p1-hydroxypyrene = 0.018, 24% increase; pΣhydroxyphenanthrene = 0.061, 17% increase).

Conclusion:
While the results suggest no change in topography variables, data showed increases in exposure to three PAH biomarkers following reduced ignition propensity implementation in Canada. These findings suggest that human studies should be considered to evaluate policy impacts.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Richard J. O'Connor   
Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA
 
REFERENCES (22):
1. Counsel of Canadian Fire Marshals and Fire Commissioners: Fire Losses in Canada 1999 Annual Report. [http://www.ccfmfc.ca/stats/en/...].
2. Counsel of Canadian Fire Marshals and Fire Commissioners: Fire Losses in Canada 2002 Annual Report. [http://www.ccfmfc.ca/stats/en/...].
3. Fire safety standards for cigarettes, ID No. DOS-53-0200018-RP. NYS Register. 2003, [http://www.dos.ny.gov/info/reg...].
4. Bill C-260: An act to amend the Hazardous Products Act. [http://www.cdaadc.ca/_files/cd...].
5. Ohlemiller TJ, Villa KM, Braun E, Eberhardt KR, Harris RH, Lawson JR, Gann RG: Test methods for quantifying the propensity of cigarettes to ignite soft furnishings. National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce, Washington DC. 1993, NIST Special Publication, 851.
6. Su JZ, Leroux P: Cigarette Ignition Propensity Testing - Series I to III. Fire Risk Management Program. Institute for Research in Construction - National Research Counsel of Canada. http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/obj/....
7. Gunja M, Ferris WG, Landman A, Connolly G, McGuire A: The case for fire safe cigarettes made through industry documents. Tob Control. 2002, 11: 346-353. 10.1136/tc.11.4.346.
8. Alpert HR, O'Connor RJ, Spalletta R, Connolly GN: Recent advances in cigarette ignition propensity research and development. Fire Technol. 2010, 46: 275-289. 10.1007/s10694-008-0070-8.
9. Connolly NG, Alpert HR, Rees V, Carpenter C, Wayne GF, Vallone D, Koh H: Effect of New York State cigarette fire safety standard on ignition propensity, smoke constituents, and consumer market. Tob Control. 2005, 14: 321-327. 10.1136/tc.2005.011759.
10. Bavley A: Fire-safe cigarettes: a slow burn in two ways. Richmond Times Dispatch. 2009, [http://www2.timesdispatch.com/...].
11. Goswami H: Reduced ignition propensity cigarettes - Facts, fiction, and manipulations. [power point slides]. 6th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases, Little Rock Arkansas. 2007, [http://www.slideshare.net/burn...].
12. Tobacco Control Programme: Overview of Responses to Regulatory Proposal for Reducing Fire Risks from Cigarettes. Health Canada. [http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hl-vs/p...].
13. O'Connor RJ, Rees VW, Norton KJ, Cummings KM, Connolly GN, Alpert HR, Sjodin A, Romanoff L, Li Z, June KM, Giovino GA: Does Switching to Reduced Ignition Propensity Cigarettes Alter Smoking Behavior or Exposure to Tobacco Smoke Constituents?. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010, 12 (10): 1011-1018. 10.1093/ntr/ntq139.
14. Hammond D, O'Connor RJ: Constituents in tobacco and smoke emissions from Canadian cigarettes. Tob Control. 2008, 17 (Suppl 1): i24-31.
15. Ashley DL, O'Connor RJ, Bernert JT, Watson CH, Polzin GM, Jain RB, Hammond D, Hatsukami DK, Giovino GA, Cummings KM, McNeill A, Shahab L, King B, Fong GT, Zhang L, Xia Y, Yan X, McCraw JM: Effect of differing levels of tobacco specific nitrosamines in cigarette smoke on the levels of biomarkers in smokers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010, 19 (6): 1389-1398. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0084.
16. Cote F, Letourneau C, Mullard G, Voisine R: Estimation of nicotine and tar yields from human-smoked cigarettes before and after the implementation of the cigarette ignition propensity regulations in Canada. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011, 61 (3 Suppl): S51-9.
17. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Methods for Evaluating Tobacco Control Policies. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. 2008, Geneva: WHO Press, 12.
18. Li Z, Romanoff LC, Trinidad DA, Hussain N, Jones RS, Porter EN, Patterson DG, Sjodin A: Measurement of urinary monohydroxy polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using automated liquid-liquid extraction and isotope dilution gas chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2006, 78 (16): 5744-5751. 10.1021/ac0606094.
19. Theophilus EH, Pence DH, Meckley DR, Keith SW, Ayres PH, Bombick BR, Borgerding MF, Garner CD, Swauger JE: Toxological Evaluation of cigarettes with two banded cigarette paper technologies. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2007, 59: 17-27. 10.1016/j.etp.2007.02.006.
20. Brzeźnicki S, Jakubowski M, Czerski B: Elimination of 1-hydroxypyrene after human volunteer exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1997, 70 (4): 257-60. 10.1007/s004200050216.
21. Li Z, Romanoff LC, Lewin MD, Porter EN, Trinidad DA, Needham LL, Patterson DG, Sjödin A: Variability of urinary concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolite in general population and comparison of spot, first-morning, and 24-h void sampling. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2010, 20 (6): 526-35. 10.1038/jes.2009.41.
22. Health Canada: Contraband Cigarettes Tobacco Smoke Analysis. [http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/p...].
 
CITATIONS (4):
1. A comprehensive evaluation of the toxicology of experimental cigarettes manufactured with banded papers
Michael S. Werley, Ann M. Jerome, Darren J. DeSoi, Christopher R. E. Coggins, Michael J. Oldham, Willie J. McKinney
Inhalation Toxicology
2. The science behind the development and performance of reduced ignition propensity cigarettes
Richard R Baker, Steven Coburn, Chuan Liu, Kevin G. McAdam
Fire Science Reviews
3. Effect of reduced ignition propensity paper bands on cigarette burning temperatures
B. Li, H.R. Pang, J. Xing, B. Wang, C. Liu, K.G. McAdam, J.P. Xie
Thermochimica Acta
4. Cadmium Intake and Systemic Exposure in Postmenopausal Women and Age-Matched Men Who Smoke Cigarettes
Andrea Ebert-McNeill, Sara P. Clark, James J. Miller, Paige Birdsall, Manisha Chandar, Lucia Wu, Elizabeth A. Cerny, Patricia H. Hall, Maribeth H. Johnson, Carlos Isales, Norman Chutkan, Maryka H. Bhattacharyya
Toxicological Sciences
eISSN:1617-9625