CASE STUDY
Building research capacity for evidence-informed tobacco control in Canada: a case description
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
 
2
Population Health Research Group, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
 
3
McMaster Child Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
 
4
Department of Population Studies and Surveillance, Cancer Care Ontario, Canada
 
5
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada
 
6
Centre for Health Promotion Studies, University of Alberta, Canada
 
 
Submission date: 2009-04-24
 
 
Acceptance date: 2009-08-07
 
 
Publication date: 2009-08-07
 
 
Tobacco Induced Diseases 2009;5(August):12
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Tobacco use remains the leading cause of death and disability in Canada. Insufficient research capacity can inhibit evidence-informed decision making for tobacco control. This paper outlines a Canadian project to build research capacity, defined as a community's ability to produce research that adequately informs practice, policy, and future research in a timely, practical manner. A key component is that individuals and teams within the community must mutually engage around common, collectively negotiated goals to address specific practices, policies or programs of research. An organizing framework, a set of activities to build strategic recruitment, productivity tools, and procedures for enhancing social capital are described. Actions are intended to facilitate better alignment between research and the priorities of policy developers and service providers, enhance the external validity of the work performed, and reduce the time required to inform policy and practice.
 
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Royal College of Physicians: Smoking and Health. 1962, London: Pitman Medical.
 
2.
Surgeon General's Advisory Committee on Smoking and Health: Smoking and Health. Public Health Service Publication No. 1103. 1964.
 
3.
World Health Organization: WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. 2004.
 
4.
Bal DG, Lloyd JC, Roeseler A, Shimizu R: California as a model. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2001, 19 (Suppl): S69-S73.
 
5.
Manske SR, Miller S, Moyer C, Phaneuf MR, Cameron RC: Best practice in group-based smoking cessation: Results of a literature review applying effectiveness, plausibility and practicality criteria. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2004, 18 (6): 409-423.
 
6.
Kusma B, Scutaru C, Quarcoo D, Welte T, Fischer TC, Groneberg-Kloft B: Tobacco control: Visualisation of research activity using density-equalizing mapping and scientometric benchmarking procedures. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009, 6: 1856-1869. 10.3390/ijerph6061856.
 
7.
Green LW: Public health asks of system science: to advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence. American Journal of Public Health. 2006, 96 (3): 406-409. 10.2105/AJPH.2005.066035.
 
8.
President's Cancer Panel: 2006–2007 Annual Report: Promoting healthy lifestyles: Policy, program and personal recommendations for reducing cancer risk. 2007, [http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/ADV...].
 
9.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs – 2007. 2007, [http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/tob...].
 
10.
Wenger E: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. 1998, New York: Cambridge University Press.
 
11.
Kawachi I, Kennedy BP: The Health of Nations: Why Inequality is Harmful to Your Health. 2002, New York: The New Press.
 
12.
Lang JC: Social context and social capital as enablers of knowledge intergration. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2004, 8 (3): 89-105. 10.1108/13673270410541060.
 
13.
Daniel B, Schwier RA, McCalla G: Social capital in virtual learning communities and distributed communities of practice. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. 2003, 29 (3): 1-13.
 
14.
Maibach EW, Van Duyn MAS, Bloodgood B: A marketing perspective on disseminating evidence-based approaches to disease prevention and health promotion. Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice and Policy. 2006, 3 (3): 1-11.
 
15.
Goering P, Butterill D, Jacobson N, Sturtevant D: Linkage and exchange at the organizational level: a model of collaboration between research and policy. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003, 8 (Suppl 2): 14-19. 10.1258/135581903322405126.
 
16.
Ross S, Lavis J, Rodriguez C, Woodside J, Denis JL: Partnership experiences: involving decision-makers in the research process. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003, 8 (Suppl 2): 26-34. 10.1258/135581903322405144.
 
17.
Kottke TE, Solberg LI, Nelson AF, Belcher DW, Caplan W, Green LW, Lydick E, Magid DJ, Rolnick SJ, Woolf SH: Optimizing Practice Through Research: A New Perspective to Solve an Old Problem. Ann Fam Med. 2008, 6 (5): 459-462. 10.1370/afm.862.
 
18.
Green LW: From research to best practices in other settings and populations. American Journal of Health Behaviour. 2001, 25: 165-178.
 
19.
Leatherdale ST, Viehbeck S, Murphy C, Norman C, Schultz A: The tobacco control community of tomorrow: A vision for training. The Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2007, 98 (1): 30-32.
 
 
CITATIONS (6):
1.
Publications as an Indicator of Increased Tobacco Control Research Productivity (Quantity and Quality) in New Zealand
A. Kira, M. Glover, C. Bullen, S. Viehbeck
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
 
2.
A Delphi study for setting up tobacco research and practice network in India
Divya Persai, Rajmohan Panda, Ravi Kumar, Andy Mc.Ewen
Tobacco Induced Diseases
 
3.
Tobacco smoking in urban neighborhoods: Exploring social capital as a protective factor in Santiago, Chile
J. C. Sapag, F. C. Poblete, C. Eicher, M. Aracena, C. Caneo, G. Vera, M. Martinez, R. Hoyos, L. Villarroel, E. Bradford
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
 
4.
Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on waterpipe (narghile, shisha, hookah) tobacco smoking during the period 2003-2012
Sa’ed H Zyoud, Samah W Al-Jabi, Waleed M Sweileh
Tobacco Induced Diseases
 
5.
Leveraging tobacco control research in India: the need for setting up a tobacco control research network
Rajmohan Panda, Divya Persai, Monika Arora
Addiction
 
6.
A bibliometric analysis of toxicology research productivity in Middle Eastern Arab countries during a 10-year period (2003–2012)
Sa’ed H Zyoud, Samah W Al-Jabi, Waleed M Sweileh, Rahmat Awang
Health Research Policy and Systems
 
eISSN:1617-9625
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top