The chest X-ray lung cancer screening program of Mayo Lung Project (MLP) yielded mixed results of improved
lung case survival but no improvement in lung cancer mortality. This paper analyzes the smoking patterns of study
participants in order to examine possible behavioral ramifications of periodic lung cancer screening. Using a
longitudinal difference-of-difference model, we compared the smoking behavior, in terms of current smoker status
among all subjects and the intensity of smoking among those continuing smokers, between those who received
periodic lung cancer screening and those who received usual-care. In both arms of this lung cancer screening trial,
there was a sizable decline in cigarette smoking one year after participants received baseline prevalence screening.
There was no significant difference in current smoker status between the intervention group receiving periodic Xray
screening and the control group receiving usual care. While we detect that the continuing smokers in the
intervention group smoked more than their counterparts in the control group, the magnitude of the difference is
not sufficient to explain a substantial difference in lung cancer incidence between the two groups. Our study
shows that periodic lung screening in MLP did not decrease smoking behavior beyond the observed decline
following the initial prevalence screening conducted at baseline for both the intervention and control groups. Our
results also indicate, paradoxically, that participants assigned to the intervention group smoked more cigarettes per
day on average than those in the control group. Lung cancer screening programs need additional cessation
components to sustain the abstinence effect typically observed following initial lung screening.
REFERENCES(28)
1.
Fontana RS: The Mayo Lung Project. Cancer. 2000, 89 (S11): 2352-2355. 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2352::AID-CNCR7>3.0.CO;2-5.
Flehinger BJ, Kimmel M, Polyak T, Melamed MR: Screening for lung cancer: The Mayo lung project revisited. Cancer. 1993, 72 (5): 1573-1580. 10.1002/1097-0142(19930901)72:5<1573::AID-CNCR2820720514>3.0.CO;2-9.
Marcus PM, Bergstralh EJ, Zweig MH, Harris A, Offord KP, Fontana RS: Extended Lung Cancer Incidence Follow-up in the Mayo Lung Project and Overdiagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006, 98 (11): 748-756. 10.1093/jnci/djj207.
Peto R, Darby S, Deo H, Silcocks P, Whitley E, Doll R: Smoking, smoking cessation, and lung cancer in the UK since 1950: combination of national statistics with two case-control studies. British Medical Journal. 2000, 321 (7257): 323-329. 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.323.
Sanderson Cox L, Patten CA, Ebbert JO, Drews AA, Croghan GA, Clark MM, Wolter TD, Decker PA, Hurt RD: Tobacco use outcomes among patients with lung cancer treated for nicotine dependence. Journal Of Clinical Oncology. 2002, 20 (16): 3461-3469. 10.1200/JCO.2002.10.085.
Taylor KL, Cox LS, Zincke N, Mehta L, McGuire C, Gelmann E: Lung cancer screening as a teachable moment for smoking cessation. Lung Cancer. 2007, 56 (1): 125-134. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.11.015.
Stevens VJ, Severson H, Lichtenstein E, Little SJ, Leben J: Making the most of a teachable moment: a smokeless-tobacco cessation intervention in the dental office. Am J Public Health. 1995, 85: 231-5. 10.2105/AJPH.85.2.231.
Gritz ER, Fingeret MC, Vidrine DJ, Lazev AB, Mehta NV, Reece GP: Successes and failures of the teachable moment: smoking cessation in cancer patients. Cancer. 2006, 106: 17-27. 10.1002/cncr.21598.
Everett KD, Gage J, Bullock L, Longo DR, Geden E, Madsen RW: A pilot study of smoking and associated behaviors of low-income expectant fathers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2005, 7 (2): 269-276.
Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators: Five-year clinical and functional outcome comparing bypass surgery and angioplasty in patients with multivessel coronary disease - A multicenter randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1997, 277 (9): 715-721. 10.1001/jama.277.9.715.
Ostroff JS, Buckshee N, Mancuso CA, Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI: Smoking cessation following CT screening for early detection of lung cancer. Preventive Medicine. 2001, 33 (6): 613-621. 10.1006/pmed.2001.0935.
The International Early Lung Cancer Action Program Investigators: Survival of Patients with Stage I Lung Cancer Detected on CT Screening. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006, 355: 1763-1771. 10.1056/NEJMoa060476. Oct 26, 2006.
Asch PD, Shea LD, Bodenhorn H: Risk Compensation and the Effectiveness of Safety Belt Use Laws: A Case Study of New Jersey. Policy Sciences. 1991, 24 (2): 181-197. 10.1007/BF00138059.
Crandall RW, Graham JD: Automobile Safety Regulation and Offsetting Behaviour: Some New Empirical Estimates. AEA Papers and Proceedings. 1984, 74 (2): 328-331.
Manning W, Marquis S: Health insurance: the trade-off between risk pooling and moral hazard. Journal of Health Economics. 1996, 15: 609-639. 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00497-3.
Saffer H, Wakefield M, Terry-McElrath Y: The Effect of Nicotine Replacement Therapy Advertising on Youth Smoking. NBER Working Paper. 2007, No. W12964, [http://ssrn.com/abstract=97159...].
Wilde GJS: Risk homeostasis theory and traffic accidents: Propositions, deductions and discussion of dissension in recent reactions., Ergonomics. Human behavior and traffic safety. Edited by: Evans L, Schwing RC. 1988, New York: Plenum Press, 31: 441-468. (pp. 193-257).
Hollis JF, McAfee TA, Fellows JL, Zbikowski SM, Stark M, Riedlinger K: The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of telephone counselling and the nicotine patch in a state tobacco quitline. Tobacco Control. 2007, 16 (Suppl 1): i53-i59. 10.1136/tc.2006.019794.
A Qualitative Study of Lung Cancer Risk Perceptions and Smoking Beliefs Among National Lung Screening Trial Participants E. R. Park, J. M. Streck, I. F. Gareen, J. S. Ostroff, K. A. Hyland, N. A. Rigotti, H. Pajolek, M. Nichter Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Predictors of Adverse Smoking Outcomes in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial S. A. Barry, M. C. Tammemagi, S. Penek, E. C. Kassan, C. S. Dorfman, T. L. Riley, J. Commin, K. L. Taylor JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Smoking cessation interventions within the context of Low-Dose Computed Tomography lung cancer screening: A systematic review Bárbara Piñeiro, Vani N. Simmons, Amanda M. Palmer, John B. Correa, Thomas H. Brandon Lung Cancer
The effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) for survivors of breast cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Jiayan Huang, Lu Shi Trials
Impact of Lung Cancer Screening Results on Smoking Cessation Martin C. Tammemägi, Christine D. Berg, Thomas L. Riley, Christopher R. Cunningham, Kathryn L. Taylor JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Effectiveness of advice from physician and nurse on smoking cessation stage in Taiwanese male smokers attending a community-based integrated screening program Dih-Ling Luh, Sam Li-Sheng Chen, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu, Ching-Yuan Fann, Hsiu-Hsi Chen Tobacco Induced Diseases
The explicit and implicit outcome expectancies of Internet games and their relationships with Internet gaming behaviors among college students Shumeng Hou, Xiaoyi Fang Computers in Human Behavior
Smoke-Free Recovery from Trauma Surgery: A Pilot Trial of an Online Smoking Cessation Program for Orthopaedic Trauma Patients Sam McCrabb, Amanda Baker, John Attia, Zsolt Balogh, Natalie Lott, Justine Naylor, Ian Harris, Christopher Doran, Johnson George, Luke Wolfenden, Eliza Skelton, Billie Bonevski International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Does Screening Participation Affect Cigarette Smokers' Decision to Quit? A Long-Horizon Panel Data Analysis Anne Line Bretteville-Jensen, Erik Bi⊘rn, Randi Selmer Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
Effect of single water adsorption on the bond order of calcium silicates and its implication for hydration variation Chongchong Qi, Xinhang Xu, Mengting Wu, Qiusong Chen Journal of the American Ceramic Society
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.